Yuen Yu Chong1, Wai Tong Chien2, Ho Yu Cheng2, Angelos P Kassianos3,4, Andrew T Gloster5, Maria Karekla4. 1. The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. conniechong@cuhk.edu.hk. 2. The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK. 4. Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. 5. Division of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on public mental health can be persistent and substantial over a long period of time, but little is known regarding what psychological factors or processes can buffer such impact. The present study aimed to examine the mediating roles of coping, psychological flexibility and prosociality in the impacts of perceived illness threats toward COVID-19 on mental health. METHOD: Five-hundred and fourteen Hong Kong citizens (18 years or above) completed an online survey to measure illness perceptions toward COVID-19, coping, psychological flexibility, prosociality, and mental health, together with their socio-demographic variables. Structural equation modelling was used to explore the explanatory model that was the best-fit to illustrate the relationships between these constructs. RESULTS: Serial mediation structural equation model showed that only psychological flexibility (unstandardised beta coefficient, β = - 0.12, 95% CI [- 0.20, - 0.02], p = 0.031) and prosociality (unstandardised β = 0.04, 95% CI [0.01, 0.08], p = 0.001) fully mediated the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health. In addition, psychological flexibility exerted a direct effect on prosociality (standardised β = 0.22, 95% CI [0.12, 0.32], p < 0.001). This best-fit model explained 62% of the variance of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Fostering psychological flexibility and prosocial behaviour may play significant roles in mitigating the adverse effects of COVID-19 and its perceived threats on public mental health.
BACKGROUND: The negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on public mental health can be persistent and substantial over a long period of time, but little is known regarding what psychological factors or processes can buffer such impact. The present study aimed to examine the mediating roles of coping, psychological flexibility and prosociality in the impacts of perceived illness threats toward COVID-19 on mental health. METHOD: Five-hundred and fourteen Hong Kong citizens (18 years or above) completed an online survey to measure illness perceptions toward COVID-19, coping, psychological flexibility, prosociality, and mental health, together with their socio-demographic variables. Structural equation modelling was used to explore the explanatory model that was the best-fit to illustrate the relationships between these constructs. RESULTS: Serial mediation structural equation model showed that only psychological flexibility (unstandardised beta coefficient, β = - 0.12, 95% CI [- 0.20, - 0.02], p = 0.031) and prosociality (unstandardised β = 0.04, 95% CI [0.01, 0.08], p = 0.001) fully mediated the relationship between illness perceptions toward COVID-19 and mental health. In addition, psychological flexibility exerted a direct effect on prosociality (standardised β = 0.22, 95% CI [0.12, 0.32], p < 0.001). This best-fit model explained 62% of the variance of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Fostering psychological flexibility and prosocial behaviour may play significant roles in mitigating the adverse effects of COVID-19 and its perceived threats on public mental health.
Authors: Sheng Zhi Zhao; Janet Yuen Ha Wong; Tzu Tsun Luk; Abraham Ka Chung Wai; Tai Hing Lam; Man Ping Wang Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Kin On Kwok; Kin Kit Li; Henry Ho Hin Chan; Yuan Yuan Yi; Arthur Tang; Wan In Wei; Samuel Yeung Shan Wong Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2020-06-21 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Jiaqi Xiong; Orly Lipsitz; Flora Nasri; Leanna M W Lui; Hartej Gill; Lee Phan; David Chen-Li; Michelle Iacobucci; Roger Ho; Amna Majeed; Roger S McIntyre Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-08-08 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Christoph Lindner; Ibolya Kotta; Eszter Eniko Marschalko; Kinga Szabo; Kinga Kalcza-Janosi; Jan Retelsdorf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yuen Yu Chong; Wai Tong Chien; Ho Yu Cheng; Demetris Lamnisos; Jeļena Ļubenko; Giovambattista Presti; Valeria Squatrito; Marios Constantinou; Christiana Nicolaou; Savvas Papacostas; Gökçen Aydin; Francisco J Ruiz; Maria B Garcia-Martin; Diana P Obando-Posada; Miguel A Segura-Vargas; Vasilis S Vasiliou; Louise McHugh; Stefan Höfer; Adriana Baban; David Dias Neto; Ana Nunes da Silva; Jean-Louis Monestès; Javier Alvarez-Galvez; Marisa Paez Blarrina; Francisco Montesinos; Sonsoles Valdivia Salas; Dorottya Őri; Bartosz Kleszcz; Raimo Lappalainen; Iva Ivanović; David Gosar; Frederick Dionne; Rhonda M Merwin; Andrew T Gloster; Maria Karekla; Angelos P Kassianos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Daniela Reisz; Iulia Crișan; Andrea Reisz; Raluca Tudor; Doina Georgescu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elisa Haller; Jelena Lubenko; Giovambattista Presti; Valeria Squatrito; Marios Constantinou; Christiana Nicolaou; Savvas Papacostas; Gökçen Aydın; Yuen Yu Chong; Wai Tong Chien; Ho Yu Cheng; Francisco J Ruiz; María B García-Martín; Diana P Obando-Posada; Miguel A Segura-Vargas; Vasilis S Vasiliou; Louise McHugh; Stefan Höfer; Adriana Baban; David Dias Neto; Ana Nunes da Silva; Jean-Louis Monestès; Javier Alvarez-Galvez; Marisa Paez-Blarrina; Francisco Montesinos; Sonsoles Valdivia-Salas; Dorottya Ori; Bartosz Kleszcz; Raimo Lappalainen; Iva Ivanović; David Gosar; Frederick Dionne; Rhonda M Merwin; Maria Karekla; Angelos P Kassianos; Andrew T Gloster Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-02-11