| Literature DB >> 27642307 |
Tesfahun Lamboro1, Tsige Ketema1, Ketema Bacha1.
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the prevalence of Salmonella and Shigella among outpatients in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Cross-sectional study was conducted involving a total of 176 outpatients. Stool specimens from both adult and pediatric outpatients were collected and analyzed for the presence of presumptive Salmonella and Shigella colonies followed by confirmation by biochemical tests. Pure cultures of Salmonella and Shigella species were further subjected to test for antibiotic resistance against the commonly used antibiotics. Furthermore, growth potential of the isolates in selected foods items was assessed following standard procedures. The result indicated that the prevalence of Salmonella and Shigella among outpatients in the study area was 19 (10.8%) and 2 (1.1%), respectively. In addition, Salmonella species were resistant to ampicillin (100%) followed by tetracycline (47.4%) and nalidixic acid (26.3%) while Shigella species were highly resistant to ampicillin and tetracycline (100%, each). Multidrug resistance towards maximum of four drugs was observed in both pathogens. The pathogens were observed growing to their infective dose within 24 hours. In conclusion, Salmonella and Shigella are still among microbes of public health importance in the study area. Thus, this calls for frequent monitory and evaluation of their prevalence and drug resistance patterns besides awareness development on water sanitation and hygienic food handling practices to the public at large.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27642307 PMCID: PMC5011499 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4210760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ISSN: 1712-9532 Impact factor: 2.471
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (outpatients), Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 2014.
| Characteristics | Category | Number of respondents | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <10 | 54 | 30.7 |
| 10–19 | 39 | 22.2 | |
| 20–29 | 34 | 19.3 | |
| 30–39 | 26 | 14.8 | |
| >39 | 23 | 13.1 | |
|
| |||
| Education level | Illiterate | 52 | 29.6 |
| Grades 1–4 | 18 | 10.2 | |
| 5–8 | 21 | 11.9 | |
| 9–12 | 27 | 15.3 | |
| >12 | 58 | 33.0 | |
|
| |||
| Gender | Male | 84 | 47.7 |
| Female | 92 | 52.3 | |
|
| |||
| Residence | Urban | 112 | 63.6 |
| Rural | 64 | 36.4 | |
|
| |||
| Occupation | Unemployed | 96 | 54.5 |
| Businessmen | 28 | 15.9 | |
| Farmer | 26 | 14.8 | |
| Civil servant | 26 | 14.8 | |
Prevalence of Salmonella and Shigella against sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants, Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 2014.
| Characteristics | Alternative | Frequency number (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 84 (47.7) | 10 (52.63) | 1 (50) |
| Female | 92 (52.3) | 9 (47.37) | 1 (50) | |
|
| ||||
| Residence | Urban | 112 (63.6) | 9 (47.37) | 0 (0.0) |
| Rural | 64 (36.4) | 10 (52.63) | 2 (100) | |
|
| ||||
| Age | <10 | 54 (30.68) | 6 (31.58) | 2 (100) |
| 11–19 | 39 (22.15) | 3 (15.79) | 0 (0) | |
| 20–29 | 34 (19.32) | 7 (36.84) | 0 (0) | |
| 30–39 | 26 (14.77) | 3 (15.79) | 0 (0) | |
| >39 | 23 (13.07) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
|
| ||||
| Educational | Illiterate | 52 (29.6) | 7 (36.84) | 2 (100) |
| 1–4 | 18 (10.2) | 2 (10.52) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 5–8 | 21 (11.9) | 5 (26.31) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 9–12 | 27 (15.3) | 1 (5.26) | 0 (0.0) | |
| >12 | 58 (33.0) | 4 (21.05) | 0 (0.0) | |
|
| ||||
| Occupation | Unemployed | 96 (54.5) | 14 (73.68) | 0 (0.0) |
| Businessmen | 28 (15.9) | 3 (15.79) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Farmer | 26 (14.8) | 2 (10.52) | 2 (100) | |
| Civil servant | 26 (14.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Salmonella and Shigella spp. isolated from diarrheal outpatients in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Jan–Mar, 2014.
| Antimicrobial agents | Disc potency |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistant | Intermediate | Sensitive | Resistant | Intermediate | Sensitive | ||
| Amikacin | 30 | — | 2 (10.5) | 17 (89.5) | — | 1 (50) | 1 (50) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 5 | — | — | 19 (100) | — | — | 2 (100) |
| Chloramphenicol | 30 | 1 (5.2) | — | 18 (94.7) | — | 1 (50) | 1 (50) |
| Gentamycin | 10 | 1 (5.2) | — | 18 (94.7) | — | — | 2 (100) |
| Cotrimoxazole | 25 | 1 (5.2) | 5 (26.3) | 13 (68.4) | 1 (50) | — | 1 (50) |
| Norfloxacin | 30 | — | — | 19 (100) | — | — | 2 (100) |
| Nalidixic acid | 30 | 5 (26.3) | 4 (21.05) | 10 (52.6) | 1 (50) | — | 1 (50) |
| Ampicillin | 10 | 19 (100) | — | — | 2 (100) | — | — |
| Tetracycline | 30 | 9 (47.4) | 3 (15.7) | 7 (36.8) | 2 (100) | — | — |
MDR of Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. isolated from diarrheal outpatients in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Jan–Mar, 2014.
| Number of antimicrobial resistance values |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antimicrobial resistance patterns | Number of isolates | Total | Antimicrobial resistance patterns | Number of isolates | |
| Two | TET/AMP | 5 (26.3) | 8 (42.1) | — | |
| SXT/AMP | 1 (5.2) | — | |||
| NAL/AMP | 2 (10.52) | — | |||
|
| |||||
| Three | TET/NAL/AMP | 2 (10.52) | 5 (26.3) | — | |
| SXT/AMP/TET | 2 (10.52) | — | |||
| NAL/SXT/AMP | 1 (5.2) | — | |||
|
| |||||
| Four | NAL/AMP/TET/SXT | 1 (5.2) | 4 (21.0) | TET/AMP/NAL/SXT | 1 |
| NAL/TET/AMP/C | 1 (5.2) | C/TET/AMP/AMK | 1 | ||
| AMP/SXT/CN/NAL | 1 (5.2) | ||||
| AMK/AMP/NAL/TET | 1 (5.2) | ||||
TET: tetracycline, AMP: ampicillin, SXT: cotrimoxazole, NAL: nalidixic acid, C: chloramphenicol, CN: gentamycin, AMK: amikacin, CIP: ciprofloxacin, and NOR: norfloxacin.
Figure 1Growth potential of species of Salmonella (a) and Shigella (b) isolated from diarrheal outpatients on meat and cereal products (Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 2014).
Figure 2pH values of meat and cereal products challenged with species of Salmonella (a) and Shigella (b) isolated from diarrheal outpatients (Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 2014).