Literature DB >> 27638810

DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015.

Veronica Salmaso1, Mattia Sturlese1, Alberto Cuzzolin1, Stefano Moro2.   

Abstract

Structure-based drug design (SBDD) has matured within the last two decades as a valuable tool for the optimization of low molecular weight lead compounds to highly potent drugs. The key step in SBDD requires knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the target-ligand complex, which is usually determined by X-ray crystallography. In the absence of structural information for the complex, SBDD relies on the generation of plausible molecular docking models. However, molecular docking protocols suffer from inaccuracies in the description of the interaction energies between the ligand and the target molecule, and often fail in the prediction of the correct binding mode. In this context, the appropriate selection of the most accurate docking protocol is absolutely relevant for the final molecular docking result, even if addressing this point is absolutely not a trivial task. D3R Grand Challenge 2015 has represented a precious opportunity to test the performance of DockBench, an integrate informatics platform to automatically compare RMDS-based molecular docking performances of different docking/scoring methods. The overall performance resulted in the blind prediction are encouraging in particular for the pose prediction task, in which several complex were predicted with a sufficient accuracy for medicinal chemistry purposes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blind prediction; D3R Grand Challenge 2015; DockBench; Docking benchmark; Molecular docking

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27638810     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9966-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  33 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

6.  Fragment-based identification and optimization of a class of potent pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazine MAP4K4 inhibitors.

Authors:  Lan Wang; Mark Stanley; Jason W Boggs; Terry D Crawford; Brandon J Bravo; Anthony M Giannetti; Seth F Harris; Steven R Magnuson; Jim Nonomiya; Stephen Schmidt; Ping Wu; Weilan Ye; Stephen E Gould; Lesley J Murray; Chudi O Ndubaku; Huifen Chen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Structure-Based Design of GNE-495, a Potent and Selective MAP4K4 Inhibitor with Efficacy in Retinal Angiogenesis.

Authors:  Chudi O Ndubaku; Terry D Crawford; Huifen Chen; Jason W Boggs; Joy Drobnick; Seth F Harris; Rajiv Jesudason; Erin McNamara; Jim Nonomiya; Amy Sambrone; Stephen Schmidt; Tanya Smyczek; Philip Vitorino; Lan Wang; Ping Wu; Stacey Yeung; Jinhua Chen; Kevin Chen; Charles Z Ding; Tao Wang; Zijin Xu; Stephen E Gould; Lesley J Murray; Weilan Ye
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Combining hit identification strategies: fragment-based and in silico approaches to orally active 2-aminothieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine inhibitors of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone.

Authors:  Paul A Brough; Xavier Barril; Jenifer Borgognoni; Patrick Chene; Nicholas G M Davies; Ben Davis; Martin J Drysdale; Brian Dymock; Suzanne A Eccles; Carlos Garcia-Echeverria; Christophe Fromont; Angela Hayes; Roderick E Hubbard; Allan M Jordan; Michael Rugaard Jensen; Andrew Massey; Angela Merrett; Antony Padfield; Rachel Parsons; Thomas Radimerski; Florence I Raynaud; Alan Robertson; Stephen D Roughley; Joseph Schoepfer; Heather Simmonite; Swee Y Sharp; Allan Surgenor; Melanie Valenti; Steven Walls; Paul Webb; Mike Wood; Paul Workman; Lisa Wright
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility.

Authors:  Garrett M Morris; Ruth Huey; William Lindstrom; Michel F Sanner; Richard K Belew; David S Goodsell; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  ChEMBL web services: streamlining access to drug discovery data and utilities.

Authors:  Mark Davies; Michał Nowotka; George Papadatos; Nathan Dedman; Anna Gaulton; Francis Atkinson; Louisa Bellis; John P Overington
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Combining self- and cross-docking as benchmark tools: the performance of DockBench in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Veronica Salmaso; Mattia Sturlese; Alberto Cuzzolin; Stefano Moro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Could the presence of sodium ion influence the accuracy and precision of the ligand-posing in the human A2A adenosine receptor orthosteric binding site using a molecular docking approach? Insights from Dockbench.

Authors:  Enrico Margiotta; Giuseppe Deganutti; Stefano Moro
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  A Deep-Learning Approach toward Rational Molecular Docking Protocol Selection.

Authors:  José Jiménez-Luna; Alberto Cuzzolin; Giovanni Bolcato; Mattia Sturlese; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Recent Advances and Applications of Molecular Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Damian Bartuzi; Agnieszka A Kaczor; Katarzyna M Targowska-Duda; Dariusz Matosiuk
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Bridging Molecular Docking to Molecular Dynamics in Exploring Ligand-Protein Recognition Process: An Overview.

Authors:  Veronica Salmaso; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.810

7.  Comparing Fragment Binding Poses Prediction Using HSP90 as a Key Study: When Bound Water Makes the Difference.

Authors:  Giovanni Bolcato; Maicol Bissaro; Mattia Sturlese; Stefano Moro
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.