Literature DB >> 11130095

Comparison between personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.

A Leminen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare personal learning curves for abdominal and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
METHODS: The first 200 patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy and the first 200 patients scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy by a single operator were compared using learning curves according to operation time, operative blood loss, and occurrence of complications.
RESULTS: Learning curves for both types of hysterectomy were rather similiar, but the learning of the laparoscopic procedure seemed to be quicker. With increasing experience the operating time decreased by 25% in abdominal and by 41% in laparoscopic hysterectomies. The mean operating time in abdominal hysterectomy was 74 min and 70 min in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operative blood loss decreased by 50% and 44%, respectively. The mean operative blood loss was smaller (203 vs 295 ml, p<0.0001) in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Increased experience had no effect on complication rates in abdominal hysterectomies, but a decrease of 44% was seen in laparoscopic hysterectomies (p<0.05). The overall complication rate (26% vs 22%) were similar for the two techniques, and only a few patients (1.5% vs 1%) had major (bladder or ureteric) complications.
CONCLUSIONS: A trained gynecologist can learn the laparoscopic technique for hysterectomy at least as quickly as the abdominal technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11130095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  Robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a community setting.

Authors:  Johann M Piquion-Joseph; Anju Nayar; Armine Ghazaryan; Ramesha Papanna; Waldemar Klimek; Rahul Laroia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-03-07

2.  Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?

Authors:  A R H Twijnstra; N A Kianmanesh Rad; M J G H Smeets; J F Admiraal; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-03-21

3.  Safe total intrafascial laparoscopic (TAIL) hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Michael K Hohl; Nik Hauser
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-03-02

4.  Gynaecologists estimate and experience laparoscopic hysterectomy as more difficult compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Theodoor E Nieboer; Marc E A Spaanderman; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-05-28

5.  Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ali Ghomi; Paul Littman; Aru Prasad; Jon Ivar Einarsson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.