Literature DB >> 27637979

Web-connected surgery: using the internet for teaching and proctoring of live robotic surgeries.

John Lenihan1, Melissa Brower2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using live teleconferencing for teaching of new robotic-assisted surgical techniques. This was a prospective study with review of outcomes (Canadian Task Force classification II-3) in a community hospital. In 2009, our community hospital acquired the da Vinci Connect™ System, a technology which allows for live surgeon-to-surgeon interaction during robotic surgery via a secure internet connection. We utilized this technology from March 2009 through March 2011 to perform 28 live robotic surgeries that were observed by surgeons and hospital staff in 14 different US states as well as in France. We also had 14 episodes where new robotic surgeons in our facilities were mentored by experienced robotic surgeons in other geographic locations live through the da Vinci Connect internet connection. We performed two live surgeries for continuing medical education courses with live interactions between the course attendees and the console surgeon. Finally, one surgeon in our hospital proctored new surgeons remotely in distant sites on challenging cases. Utilizing computers that allow an experienced mentor surgeon to interact with less experienced surgeons on a live case is invaluable and presages the way we will train surgeons in the future. This feasibility study validates the need to pursue this technology for future education and training as well as for real-time collaboration.

Keywords:  Internet; Mentoring; Proctoring; Robotic surgery; Telesurgery; Web connected

Year:  2011        PMID: 27637979     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  5 in total

1.  Minimally invasive and robotic surgery.

Authors:  M J Mack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy?

Authors:  Jochen Binder; Ronald Bräutigam; Dietger Jonas; Wassilios Bentas
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients.

Authors:  F Marchal; P Rauch; J Vandromme; I Laurent; A Lobontiu; B Ahcel; J L Verhaeghe; C Meistelman; M Degueldre; J P Villemot; F Guillemin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.

Authors:  A W Partin; J B Adams; R G Moore; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.113

  5 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  A Smarter Health through the Internet of Surgical Things.

Authors:  Francesk Mulita; Georgios-Ioannis Verras; Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos; Konstantinos Kotis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Proctorship in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Assad Zahid; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

3.  A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel H Shin; Leonard Dalag; Raed A Azhar; Michael Santomauro; Raj Satkunasivam; Charles Metcalfe; Matthew Dunn; Andre Berger; Hooman Djaladat; Mike Nguyen; Mihir M Desai; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 5.969

4.  Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Swar H Shah; Troy Adebar; Eric Hwang; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

5.  Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Andrew A Stanley; Thomas Clifford; Inderbir S Gill; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.