OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect(™) ; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17%) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3%) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. CONCLUSION: In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel, second-generation telementoring interface (Connect(™) ; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for the da Vinci robot. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Robotic surgery trainees were mentored during portions of robot-assisted prostatectomy and renal surgery cases. Cases were assigned as traditional in-room mentoring or remote mentoring using Connect. While viewing two-dimensional, real-time video of the surgical field, remote mentors delivered verbal and visual counsel, using two-way audio and telestration (drawing) capabilities. Perioperative and technical data were recorded. Trainee robotic performance was rated using a validated assessment tool by both mentors and trainees. The mentoring interface was rated using a multi-factorial Likert-based survey. The Mann-Whitney and t-tests were used to determine statistical differences. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 mentored surgical cases (29 in-room, 26 remote). Perioperative variables of operative time and blood loss were similar between in-room and remote mentored cases. Robotic skills assessment showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Mentors preferred remote over in-room telestration (P = 0.05); otherwise no significant difference existed in evaluation of the interfaces. Remote cases using wired (vs wireless) connections had lower latency and better data transfer (P = 0.005). Three of 18 (17%) wireless sessions were disrupted; one was converted to wired, one continued after restarting Connect, and the third was aborted. A bipolar injury to the colon occurred during one (3%) in-room mentored case; no intraoperative injuries were reported during remote sessions. CONCLUSION: In a tightly controlled environment, the Connect interface allows trainee robotic surgeons to be telementored in a safe and effective manner while performing basic surgical techniques. Significant steps remain prior to widespread use of this technology.
Authors: Ashlee L Smith; Thomas C Krivak; Eirwen M Scott; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Paniti Sukumvanich; Alexander B Olawaiye; Scott D Richard Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Andrew J Hung; Isuru S Jayaratna; Kara Teruya; Mihir M Desai; Inderbir S Gill; Alvin C Goh Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Michael A Ricci; Michael Caputo; Judith Amour; Frederick B Rogers; Kenneth Sartorelli; Peter W Callas; Patrick T Malone Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Alexander Q Ereso; Pablo Garcia; Elaine Tseng; Monica M Dua; Gregory P Victorino; Ltc Thomas S Guy Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.226