Literature DB >> 27637789

Patients with prior TURP undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have higher positive surgical margin rates.

Lance Hampton1, Rebecca A Nelson2, Roger Satterthwaite2, Timothy Wilson2, Laura Crocitto2.   

Abstract

With the incidence of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) increasing, questions regarding the significance of margin status have arisen. Patients with a history of a prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) may have a higher incidence of positive margins because of the prior surgery. We examined our IRB-approved database to determine whether patients who had undergone a prior TURP had higher rates of positive margins than patients who had no history of TURP. Between July 2003 and March 2007, six urologic surgeons in our medical group (City of Hope medical group) performed RALP on 2,041 patients. Consent to enter the database was obtained from 1,768 patients. Of these, 51 had undergone prior TURP. Patients with a history of TURP before undergoing RALP had positive margin rates of 35.3% (18 of 51) compared with 17.6% (18 of 102) of patients without a history of TURP (P = 0.015). The location of the positive margins was statistically more prevalent at the bladder neck in TURP patients (13.7 vs. 2.0%) than in non-TURP patients (Fisher's exact P value = 0.004). These two groups were statistically similar with regard to other variables examined including race, BMI, preoperative PSA, Gleason score, and pathologic stage. Patients who underwent RALP following TURP were found to have a higher positive margin rate. The positive margins were more likely to be located at the bladder neck in TURP versus non-TURP patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Prostate; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; TURP

Year:  2008        PMID: 27637789     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0121-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral prostatectomy appropriated?

Authors:  Sunai Leewansangtong; Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2006-08

3.  Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Sanjeev Kaul; Akshay Bhandari; Alok Shrivastava; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok Hemal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique.

Authors:  B Guillonneau; G Vallancien
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients following transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Ran Katz; Tomasz Borkowski; Andras Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Matthew T Gettman; Clement Claude Abbou
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  [Radical prostatectomy in patients with history of transurethral resection of the prostate].

Authors:  Anna Bujons Tur; María Montlleó González; Xavier Pascual García; Antonio Rosales Bordes; Juan Caparrós Sariol; Humberto Villavicencio Mavrich
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.436

7.  Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Renzo Colombo; Richard Naspro; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Marco Raber; Nazareno Suardi; Antonino Saccà; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  Jamison Jaffe; Oleksandr Stakhovsky; Xavier Cathelineau; Eric Barret; Guy Vallancien; François Rozet
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy following previous prostate resection.

Authors:  J Ramon; G Rossignol; P Leandri; J R Gautier
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Joseph A Smith; Robert C Chan; Sam S Chang; S Duke Herrell; Peter E Clark; Roxy Baumgartner; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Does previous transurethral prostate surgery affect oncologic and continence outcomes after RARP?

Authors:  Yu-Kai Su; Benjamin F Katz; Shailen S Sehgal; Sue-Jean S Yu; Yu-Chen Su; Andrew Lightfoot; Ziho Lee; Elton Llukani; Kelly Monahan; David I Lee
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-08-08

2.  Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in morbidly obese patients: how to create a cost-effective adequate optical trocar.

Authors:  Andrea Cestari; Mattia Sangalli; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Massimo Lazzeri; Alessandro Larcher; Emanuele Scapaticci; Giovanni Lughezzani; Fabio Fabbri; Patrizio Rigatti; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-03-08

3.  Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huihuang Li; Cheng Zhao; Peihua Liu; Jiao Hu; Zhenglin Yi; Jinbo Chen; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

4.  Transurethral resection of the prostate is an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kun Jin; Shi Qiu; Xin-Yang Liao; Xiao-Nan Zheng; Xiang Tu; Lian-Sha Tang; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.