Literature DB >> 16280816

Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques.

Mani Menon1, Sanjeev Kaul, Akshay Bhandari, Alok Shrivastava, Ashutosh Tewari, Ashok Hemal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Anatomical nerve sparing radical prostatectomy provides excellent cancer control, although the recovery of sexual function is variable. We recently described a technique to preserve the prostatic fascia (veil of Aphrodite) that appears to enhance the quality of nerve preservation during robotic prostatectomy. In January 2003 we initiated a prospective study comparing patients undergoing prostatic fascia preservation with those undergoing conventional nerve sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. We report results at 12 months of followup
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to August 2003, 58 potent men with a Sexual Health Inventory for Men score (SHIM) of greater than 21 without phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors underwent Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, including 35 with preservation of the prostatic fascia (study) and 23 with conventional nerve sparing (control). Potency was assessed with self-administered SHIM questionnaires 12 months after surgery. The primary end point was achievement of erections strong enough for penetration with or without oral medications. The secondary end point was the ability to achieve normal erections (SHIM greater than 21) with and without medications.
RESULTS: At 12 months of followup 17 of 23 control (74%) and 34 of 35 study (97%) patients achieved erections strong enough for intercourse (p = 0.002). Four control (17%) and 18 study (51%) patients achieved normal erections (SHIM greater than 21) without medication (p <0.0001). Six control (26%) and 30 study (86%) patients achieved normal erections with or without phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (p <0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Potency rates after radical prostatectomy vary with the measure used to define potency. Irrespective of the definition used patients undergoing prostatic fascia preserving radical prostatectomy have significantly better potency outcomes than patients undergoing conventional nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy at 12 months of followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280816     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181825.54480.eb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  47 in total

1.  Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Robert A Leung; Masato Fujisawa; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Prostate cancer treatment. The case for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Miles A Goldstraw
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Robotic technology in urology.

Authors:  D Murphy; B Challacombe; M S Khan; P Dasgupta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Benjamin J Challacombe; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Patients with prior TURP undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have higher positive surgical margin rates.

Authors:  Lance Hampton; Rebecca A Nelson; Roger Satterthwaite; Timothy Wilson; Laura Crocitto
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-11-14

7.  Impact of Partin nomogram on presurgical planning: intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jeongyun Jeong; Eun Yong Choi; Dong Il Kang; Dong-Hyeon Lee; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-20

8.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Greece: the learning curve and beyond. The initial 40 cases.

Authors:  N P Pardalidis; N A Andriopoulos; A Tsiga; N Giannakou; E Kosmaoglou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-06-17

9.  High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-28

10.  Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert B Nadler; Jessica T Casey; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Zachary L Smith; Ali Zhumkhawala; Amanda M Macejko
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.