Literature DB >> 16903548

[Radical prostatectomy in patients with history of transurethral resection of the prostate].

Anna Bujons Tur1, María Montlleó González, Xavier Pascual García, Antonio Rosales Bordes, Juan Caparrós Sariol, Humberto Villavicencio Mavrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To perform a retrospective evaluation of surgical complications and morbidity in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) as elective treatment for organ-confined prostate cancer in our center with previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
METHODS: Between 1980-2004 we performed 59 radical prostatectomies in patients with previous TURP. We analyze the morbidity and mortality of the RRP, its functional outcomes, and the accordance between clinical and pathological stage.
RESULTS: Mean time between TURP and RRP was 16 months. Mean patient age at the time of diagnosis was 63 years. Clinical stage: 16 T1a, 18T1b, 20T1c, 3T2a, 2T2b. Average surgical time was 180 minutes. Intraoperative events: technical difficulties in the dissection of the gland 57%, bladder neck preservation 27%, neuro vascular bundles preservation 3.39%, ureter ligation 1.69%, rectal laceration 1.69, urethrorrhagia 1.69%, urinary leak 5%, and blood transfusions 11.8%. Postoperative complications: urinary tract infection 10.17%, wound infection 10.17%, pelvic hematoma 5.08%, deep vein thrombosis 1.69%, and one sudden death of unknown cause one month after surgery. Pathologic report: 49pT2b, 8 pT3 and 2pT4. Late complications: erectile dysfunction 85.7%, vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis 10.3%, and complete urinary incontinence 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with previous TURP is technically more difficult and has comparable outcomes to RRP patients without previous TURP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16903548     DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142006000500003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Esp Urol        ISSN: 0004-0614            Impact factor:   0.436


  5 in total

1.  Patients with prior TURP undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have higher positive surgical margin rates.

Authors:  Lance Hampton; Rebecca A Nelson; Roger Satterthwaite; Timothy Wilson; Laura Crocitto
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-11-14

2.  Robotic or open radical prostatectomy after previous open surgery in the pelvic region.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mustafa; Curtis A Pettaway; John W Davis; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-02-05

3.  Does previous transurethral prostate surgery affect oncologic and continence outcomes after RARP?

Authors:  Yu-Kai Su; Benjamin F Katz; Shailen S Sehgal; Sue-Jean S Yu; Yu-Chen Su; Andrew Lightfoot; Ziho Lee; Elton Llukani; Kelly Monahan; David I Lee
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-08-08

4.  Transurethral resection of the prostate is an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kun Jin; Shi Qiu; Xin-Yang Liao; Xiao-Nan Zheng; Xiang Tu; Lian-Sha Tang; Lu Yang; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Does a previous prostate biopsy-related acute bacterial prostatitis affect the results of radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Hakan Türk; Sitki Ün; Erkan Arslan; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.