Literature DB >> 27637529

Rare use of robotic surgery for removal of large urachal carcinoma.

Radomir Kosanovic1, Rey J Romero1, Jonathan K Arad1, Michelle Gallas1, Rupa Seetharamaiah1, Anthony M Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has been used traditionally for removal of colorectal, gastric and gallbladder disease pathologies with great success. Many advantages have been demonstrated with the addition of robotic surgery, such as 3-D visualization, articulation of instruments and improved surgeon ergonomics while operating. These benefits have allowed the implementation of robotic surgery into new areas. We describe here a rare case of a robotic resection of an urachal carcinoma. A 53-year-old female patient presented to her primary care physician (PCP) with a chief complaint of recurrent urinary tract infections. An initial urinary bladder ultrasound showed a large mass anterior and superior to the bladder, thus prompting an abdominal/pelvic MRI, which confirmed a large complex cystic mass anterior to and abutting the urinary bladder (5.4 × 6.7 × 5.9 cm). A follow-up cystoscopy showed no abnormal findings within the bladder. Based on the patient's symptoms and imaging, a careful evaluation by her PCP, oncology and surgical team prompted for the removal of the mass. Because of the uncertainty, complexity and location of the mass the patient was offered surgical treatment with the da Vinci robot. Histopathology revealed an urachal adenocarcinoma, well differentiated. We present that surgical resection of an urachal tumor can be performed with the da Vinci robot. Robotic surgery can add to the benefits seen with the conventional laparoscopic approach and thus can be an accepted method for treatment of abdominal wall masses.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 27637529     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-013-0415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  13 in total

Review 1.  Surgical and chemotherapeutic options for urachal carcinoma: report of ten cases and literature review.

Authors:  Satoshi Yazawa; Eiji Kikuchi; Toshikazu Takeda; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Akira Miyajima; Ken Nakagawa; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  The use of robotically assisted surgery for treating urachal anomalies.

Authors:  Ralph Madeb; Joy K Knopf; Craig Nicholson; Laurence A Donahue; Brian Adcock; David Dever; Beng Jit Tan; John R Valvo; Louis Eichel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  The role of robotics in surgery: a review.

Authors:  Justin M Albani
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  The current status of robotic oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Hua-Yin Yu; David F Friedlander; Sunil Patel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Laparoscopic excision of urachal sinus.

Authors:  E Trondsen; O Reiertsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993-02

6.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy and urachal resection for urachal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Philippe E Spiess; Jose J Correa
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 7.  Malignant urachal lesions.

Authors:  C A Sheldon; R V Clayman; R Gonzalez; R D Williams; E E Fraley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  [The role of minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors in children].

Authors:  S Ionescu; B Andrei; S Filip; D C Nicoară
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

9.  Urachal carcinoma: the case for extended partial cystectomy.

Authors:  H W Herr
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Jaydeep H Palep
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.