Literature DB >> 23161385

The current status of robotic oncologic surgery.

Hua-Yin Yu1, David F Friedlander, Sunil Patel, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

The use of robotic assistance facilitates minimally invasive surgery and has been widely adopted across multiple specialties. This article reviews the published literature on use of this technology for treatment of oncologic conditions. PubMed searches were performed for articles published between 2000 and 2012 using the keywords "robotic" or "robotic surgery" in conjunction with "oncology" or "cancer." Although the most common use for robotics was to treat urologic oncologic conditions, it has also been widely adopted for gynecologic, general, thoracic, and head and neck surgeries. For several procedures, there is evidence that robotics offers short-term benefits such as shorter lengths of stay and lower intraoperative blood loss, with safety profiles and oncologic outcomes comparable to open or conventional laparoscopic approaches. However, long-term oncologic outcomes are generally lacking, and robotic surgeries are more costly than open or laparoscopic surgeries. Robotic technology is widely used in oncologic surgery with demonstrated short-term advantages. However, whether the benefits of robotics justify the higher costs warrant large comparative effectiveness studies with long-term outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161385     DOI: 10.3322/caac.21160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  14 in total

1.  Rare use of robotic surgery for removal of large urachal carcinoma.

Authors:  Radomir Kosanovic; Rey J Romero; Jonathan K Arad; Michelle Gallas; Rupa Seetharamaiah; Anthony M Gonzalez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  Role of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in suprapancreatic nodal dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Daniel Reim; Ji Yeon Park; Bang Wool Eom; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Keun Won Ryu; Hong Man Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Andrea M Avondstondt; Michelle Wallenstein; Christopher R D'Adamo; Robert M Ehsanipoor
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-04-24

4.  Patterns of stereotactic body radiation therapy: The influence of lung cancer treatment on prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Jonathan G Yabes; Samia H Lopa; Dwight E Heron; Chung-Chou H Chang; Justin E Bekelman; Joel B Nelson; Julie P W Bynum; Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study.

Authors:  Antonio Toesca; Nickolas Peradze; Andrea Manconi; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Marco Colleoni; Bernardo Bonanni; Giuseppe Curigliano; Mario Rietjens; Giuseppe Viale; Virgilio Sacchini; Paolo Veronesi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Authors:  Judicaël Hotton; Emilie Bogart; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.339

8.  A novel approach emphasising intra-operative superficial margin enhancement of head-neck tumours with narrow-band imaging in transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  C Vicini; F Montevecchi; G D'Agostino; A DE Vito; G Meccariello
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Who should adopt robotic surgery, and when?

Authors:  Jessica K Smyth; Karen E Deveney; Robert M Sade
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 10.  Robotic right colectomy: A worthwhile procedure? Results of a meta-analysis of trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Petrucciani; Dario Sirimarco; Giuseppe R Nigri; Paolo Magistri; Marco La Torre; Paolo Aurello; Francesco D'Angelo; Giovanni Ramacciato
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.