Labib Mohamed Labib1, Sameh Mahmoud Nabih2, Kusai Baroudi3. 1. Lecturer, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia . 2. Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar, University , Cairo, Egypt . 3. Associate Professor, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges , Riyadh, Saudi Arabia .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The effect of nanoleakage on the integrity of resin-dentin bond has been in interest for long-term adhesion. AIM: This study evaluated the nanoleakage in premolar teeth restored with low shrinkable resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 human premolars were used for nanoleakage evaluation in this study. Each group was divided into four equal groups; Group A: using silorane with its adhesive system. Group B: using silorane with G-bond. Group C: using Filtek supreme composite with G-bond. Group D: using Filtek supreme composite with AdheSE adhesive. Nanoleakage analysed using Scaning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometery (EDX). RESULTS: The amount of silver present in hybrid layer depend on the adhesive used; this indicated different nanoleakage expressions in different adhesive systems. Filtek Z350 composite with G-bond showed clear silver uptake in both the adhesive and hybrid layer. Low shrinkable resin composite (silorane) with its adhesive system showed less silver penetration and slight silver peak on the elemental energy spectroscopy of energy dispersive X-Ray spectrometry (EDS) as compared to other samples. CONCLUSION: Adhesives used between different groups, influence the location and degree of nanoleakage. There is difference in nanoleakage patterns between two-step and one-step adhesives and also among the one-step adhesives themselves.
INTRODUCTION: The effect of nanoleakage on the integrity of resin-dentin bond has been in interest for long-term adhesion. AIM: This study evaluated the nanoleakage in premolar teeth restored with low shrinkable resin composite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 human premolars were used for nanoleakage evaluation in this study. Each group was divided into four equal groups; Group A: using silorane with its adhesive system. Group B: using silorane with G-bond. Group C: using Filtek supreme composite with G-bond. Group D: using Filtek supreme composite with AdheSE adhesive. Nanoleakage analysed using Scaning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometery (EDX). RESULTS: The amount of silver present in hybrid layer depend on the adhesive used; this indicated different nanoleakage expressions in different adhesive systems. Filtek Z350 composite with G-bond showed clear silver uptake in both the adhesive and hybrid layer. Low shrinkable resin composite (silorane) with its adhesive system showed less silver penetration and slight silver peak on the elemental energy spectroscopy of energy dispersive X-Ray spectrometry (EDS) as compared to other samples. CONCLUSION: Adhesives used between different groups, influence the location and degree of nanoleakage. There is difference in nanoleakage patterns between two-step and one-step adhesives and also among the one-step adhesives themselves.
Authors: M Hashimoto; J De Munck; S Ito; H Sano; M Kaga; H Oguchi; B Van Meerbeek; D H Pashley Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Salvatore Sauro; David H Pashley; Francesco Mannocci; Franklin R Tay; Peter Pilecki; Martyn Sherriff; Timothy F Watson Journal: Eur J Oral Sci Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.612