Namanjeet Ahluwalia1, Kirsten A Herrick2, Lauren M Rossen3, Donna Rhodes4, Brian Kit2, Alanna Moshfegh4, Kevin W Dodd5. 1. Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and n.ahluwalia@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and. 3. Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD. 4. Food Surveys Research Group, USDA, Beltsville, MD; and. 5. National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, few studies have described the usual nutrient intakes of US children aged <2 y or assessed the nutrient adequacy of their diets relative to the recommended Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). OBJECTIVE: We estimated the usual nutrient intake of US children aged 6-23 mo examined in NHANES 2009-2012 and compared them to age-specific DRIs as applicable. DESIGN: Dietary intake was assessed with two 24-h recalls for infants aged 6-11 mo (n = 381) and toddlers aged 12-23 mo (n = 516) with the use of the USDA's Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Estimates of usual nutrient intakes from food and beverages were obtained with the use of the National Cancer Institute method. The proportions of children with intakes below and above the DRI were also estimated. RESULTS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients; however, 10% had an iron intake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), and only 21% had a vitamin D intake that met or exceeded the recommended Adequate Intake (AI). More nutrient inadequacies were noted among toddlers; 1 in 4 had a lower-than-recommended fat intake (percentage of energy), and most had intakes that were below the EAR for vitamins E (82%) and D (74%). Few toddlers (<1%) met or exceeded the AI for fiber and potassium. In contrast, 1 in 2 had sodium intakes that exceeded the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL); ≥16% and 41% of the children had excessive intakes (greater than the ULs) of vitamin A and zinc, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients. Most toddlers were at risk for inadequate intakes of vitamins D and E and had diets low in fiber and potassium. The sources contributing to excessive intakes of vitamin A and zinc among infants and toddlers may need further evaluation.
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, few studies have described the usual nutrient intakes of US children aged <2 y or assessed the nutrient adequacy of their diets relative to the recommended Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). OBJECTIVE: We estimated the usual nutrient intake of US children aged 6-23 mo examined in NHANES 2009-2012 and compared them to age-specific DRIs as applicable. DESIGN: Dietary intake was assessed with two 24-h recalls for infants aged 6-11 mo (n = 381) and toddlers aged 12-23 mo (n = 516) with the use of the USDA's Automated Multiple-Pass Method. Estimates of usual nutrient intakes from food and beverages were obtained with the use of the National Cancer Institute method. The proportions of children with intakes below and above the DRI were also estimated. RESULTS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients; however, 10% had an iron intake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), and only 21% had a vitamin D intake that met or exceeded the recommended Adequate Intake (AI). More nutrient inadequacies were noted among toddlers; 1 in 4 had a lower-than-recommended fat intake (percentage of energy), and most had intakes that were below the EAR for vitamins E (82%) and D (74%). Few toddlers (<1%) met or exceeded the AI for fiber and potassium. In contrast, 1 in 2 had sodium intakes that exceeded the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL); ≥16% and 41% of the children had excessive intakes (greater than the ULs) of vitamin A and zinc, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The estimated usual intakes of infants were adequate for most nutrients. Most toddlers were at risk for inadequate intakes of vitamins D and E and had diets low in fiber and potassium. The sources contributing to excessive intakes of vitamin A and zinc among infants and toddlers may need further evaluation.
Authors: Kevin W Dodd; Patricia M Guenther; Laurence S Freedman; Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Janet A Tooze; Susan M Krebs-Smith Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-10
Authors: Janet A Tooze; Douglas Midthune; Kevin W Dodd; Laurence S Freedman; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Patricia M Guenther; Raymond J Carroll; Victor Kipnis Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-10
Authors: Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; David J Baer; Theophile Murayi; John C Clemens; William V Rumpler; David R Paul; Rhonda S Sebastian; Kevin J Kuczynski; Linda A Ingwersen; Robert C Staples; Linda E Cleveland Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Kameron J Moding; Mackenzie J Ferrante; Laura L Bellows; Alyssa J Bakke; John E Hayes; Susan L Johnson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Regan L Bailey; Jamy D Ard; Teresa A Davis; Tim S Naimi; Barbara O Schneeman; Jaime S Stang; Kathryn G Dewey; Sharon M Donovan; Rachel Novotny; Linda G Snetselaar; Janet de Jesus; Kellie O Casavale; TusaRebecca Pannucci; Eve E Stoody Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Amy L Lovell; Tania Milne; Misa Matsuyama; Rebecca J Hill; Peter S W Davies; Cameron C Grant; Clare R Wall Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2021-06-10
Authors: Melissa C Kay; Emily W Duffy; Lisa J Harnack; Andrea S Anater; Joel C Hampton; Alison L Eldridge; Mary Story Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Jessica G Woo; Kelly Reynolds; Suzanne Summer; Philip R Khoury; Stephen R Daniels; Heidi J Kalkwarf Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2020-10-24 Impact factor: 5.234