Literature DB >> 17000190

A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution.

Janet A Tooze1, Douglas Midthune, Kevin W Dodd, Laurence S Freedman, Susan M Krebs-Smith, Amy F Subar, Patricia M Guenther, Raymond J Carroll, Victor Kipnis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We propose a new statistical method that uses information from two 24-hour recalls to estimate usual intake of episodically consumed foods. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: The method developed at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) accommodates the large number of nonconsumption days that occur with foods by separating the probability of consumption from the consumption-day amount, using a two-part model. Covariates, such as sex, age, race, or information from a food frequency questionnaire, may supplement the information from two or more 24-hour recalls using correlated mixed model regression. The model allows for correlation between the probability of consuming a food on a single day and the consumption-day amount. Percentiles of the distribution of usual intake are computed from the estimated model parameters.
RESULTS: The Eating at America's Table Study data are used to illustrate the method to estimate the distribution of usual intake for whole grains and dark-green vegetables for men and women and the distribution of usual intakes of whole grains by educational level among men. A simulation study indicates that the NCI method leads to substantial improvement over existing methods for estimating the distribution of usual intake of foods.
CONCLUSIONS: The NCI method provides distinct advantages over previously proposed methods by accounting for the correlation between probability of consumption and amount consumed and by incorporating covariate information. Researchers interested in estimating the distribution of usual intakes of foods for a population or subpopulation are advised to work with a statistician and incorporate the NCI method in analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000190      PMCID: PMC2517157          DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  10 in total

1.  Low energy reporters vs others: a comparison of reported food intakes.

Authors:  S M Krebs-Smith; B I Graubard; L L Kahle; A F Subar; L E Cleveland; R Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake.

Authors:  J Trabulsi; D A Schoeller
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.310

3.  Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero.

Authors:  Janet A Tooze; Gary K Grunwald; Richard H Jones
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Sociodemographic, knowledge, and attitudinal factors related to meat consumption in the United States.

Authors:  Patricia M Guenther; Helen H Jensen; S Patricia Batres-Marquez; Chun-Fu Chen
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-08

Review 5.  Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory.

Authors:  Kevin W Dodd; Patricia M Guenther; Laurence S Freedman; Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Janet A Tooze; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-10

6.  The food propensity questionnaire: concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Kevin W Dodd; Patricia M Guenther; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Margaret McDowell; Janet A Tooze; Laurence S Freedman; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-10

7.  Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires : the Eating at America's Table Study.

Authors:  A F Subar; F E Thompson; V Kipnis; D Midthune; P Hurwitz; S McNutt; A McIntosh; S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique.

Authors:  R J Hill; P S Davies
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Richard P Troiano; Douglas Midthune; Dale A Schoeller; Sheila Bingham; Carolyn O Sharbaugh; Jillian Trabulsi; Shirley Runswick; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Joel Sunshine; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting.

Authors:  J Macdiarmid; J Blundell
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.800

  10 in total
  204 in total

1.  Regression calibration when foods (measured with error) are the variables of interest: markedly non-Gaussian data with many zeroes.

Authors:  Gary E Fraser; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Krebs-Smith; Patricia M Guenther; Amy F Subar; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  A population's distribution of Healthy Eating Index-2005 component scores can be estimated when more than one 24-hour recall is available.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Patricia M Guenther; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Kevin W Dodd; Douglas Midthune
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Dietary supplement use is associated with higher intakes of minerals from food sources.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Victor L Fulgoni; Debra R Keast; Johanna T Dwyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons.

Authors:  Mazda Jenab; Nadia Slimani; Magda Bictash; Pietro Ferrari; Sheila A Bingham
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 2-More complex methods of adjustment and advanced topics.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Ruth H Keogh; Victor Kipnis; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Helmut Küchenhoff; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents and adults in the United States: percentage meeting individualized recommendations.

Authors:  Joel Kimmons; Cathleen Gillespie; Jennifer Seymour; Mary Serdula; Heidi Michels Blanck
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-26

8.  Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015.

Authors:  Jill Reedy; Jennifer L Lerman; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; TusaRebecca E Pannucci; Magdalena M Wilson; Amy F Subar; Lisa L Kahle; Janet A Tooze
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 9.  Applications of the Healthy Eating Index for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Intervention Research: Considerations and Caveats.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith; TusaRebecca E Pannucci; Amy F Subar; Magdalena M Wilson; Jennifer L Lerman; Janet A Tooze
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.910

10.  Usual nutrient intakes of US infants and toddlers generally meet or exceed Dietary Reference Intakes: findings from NHANES 2009-2012.

Authors:  Namanjeet Ahluwalia; Kirsten A Herrick; Lauren M Rossen; Donna Rhodes; Brian Kit; Alanna Moshfegh; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.