Literature DB >> 27628112

Anesthesia considerations for robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Mohamed Badawy1, François Béïque2, Hani Al-Halal3, Tania Azar3, Khalid Akkour3, Susie K Lau3, Walter H Gotlieb3.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted gynecologic surgery is performed with a pneumoperitoneum and prolonged maximum Trendelenburg position which can result in adverse physiologic effects. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of robot-assisted gynecologic oncology procedures and to identify anesthesia-related peri-operative adverse events. This is a case series performed on the first 133 patients who underwent a robot-assisted gynecologic oncology procedure at a tertiary care facility. Data was collected from electronically archived patient charts and from a prospective surgical database. Patient demographics were recorded and significant intra-operative and post-operative adverse events were reviewed. Robot-assisted surgery for gynecologic oncologic surgery with the use of extreme Trendelenburg in all patients was safely and successfully performed across a wide range of ages, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores and body mass indices. Although most patients developed various degree of facial edema, only 5% of patients had a delayed extubation. Transient intra-operative hypoxemia (O2 saturation < 90%) occurred in 3.75% (5/133) of patients and hypercapnia (CO2 > 45 mmHg) in 18% (24/133). The mean duration of surgery was 254 min and median hospital stay was 1 day. Anesthetic and peri-operative complications are rare for patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic oncology surgeries despite the prolonged use of maximum Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum. Although there are new anesthetic challenges, these surgeries were safely performed in a wide range of patients with minimal blood loss, short hospital stay and no significant cardiopulmonary complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Cervix cancer; Endometrial cancer; Gynecologic oncology; Robot-assisted surgery; Safety

Year:  2011        PMID: 27628112     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0261-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  13 in total

1.  Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  S V N Phong; L K D Koh
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 2.  Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.

Authors:  Liselotte Mettler; Thoralf Schollmeyer; John Boggess; Javier F Magrina; Agnieszka Oleszczuk
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  [A case of pneumothorax during laparoscopic surgery due to latent diaphragmatic defect].

Authors:  Masaru Tanno; Tohru Iizuka; Koji Fujisawa; Hisashi Fukushima; Yuko Watanabe
Journal:  Masui       Date:  2009-02

4.  Anesthetic care of the patient for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Sullivan; Elizabeth A M Frost; Michael W Lew
Journal:  Middle East J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2008-06

5.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Omer Devaja; Ioanna Samara; Andreas J Papadopoulos
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Pressure-controlled vs volume-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Mustafa Oğurlu; Mert Küçük; Ferruh Bilgin; Ali Sizlan; Omer Yanarateş; Sami Eksert; Emre Karaşahin; Ahmet Coşar
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Comparison of two ventilatory strategies in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  T N Weingarten; F X Whalen; D O Warner; O Gajic; G J Schears; M R Snyder; D R Schroeder; J Sprung
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Critical analysis of complications after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with identification of preoperative and operative risk factors.

Authors:  Eric C Kauffman; Casey K Ng; Ming Ming Lee; Brandon J Otto; Alyse Portnoff; Gerald J Wang; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 9.  Cardiopulmonary function and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R W Wahba; F Béïque; S J Kleiman
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Clinical review: post-extubation laryngeal edema and extubation failure in critically ill adult patients.

Authors:  Bastiaan H J Wittekamp; Walther N K A van Mook; Dave H T Tjan; Jan Harm Zwaveling; Dennis C J J Bergmans
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  3 in total

1.  Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Christine E Foley; Erika Ryan; Jian Qun Huang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-06-22

2.  Optic nerve sheath diameter-guided extubation plan in obese patients undergoing robotic pelvic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: A report of three cases.

Authors:  Nambiath Sujata; Raj Tobin; Punit Mehta; Gautam Girotra
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-11

3.  Prolonged intubation after robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: Case reports.

Authors:  Marcia A Ciccone; Marianne S Hom; Elise B Morocco; Laila I Muderspach; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.