Literature DB >> 19106665

Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.

Liselotte Mettler1, Thoralf Schollmeyer, John Boggess, Javier F Magrina, Agnieszka Oleszczuk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The da Vinci robot has proved to be the most advanced surgical system in gynecology. In this review we evaluated the possibilities of applying robotic assistance to improve gynecological endoscopic oncological surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: A literature survey on robotic-assisted gynecological oncology clearly supports the use of the da Vinci surgical system in laparoscopic oncological surgery. Robotic precision in tumor excision, easier intracorporal suturing and favorable ergonomics for the surgeon make the da Vinci robot particularly suitable for performing complex laparoscopic microinvasive surgical operations in gynecological oncology.
SUMMARY: Robotic surgery combines the advantages of open surgery and endoscopic surgery. In our opinion, robotic surgery may lead to better results than conventional laparoscopic surgery, particularly in the field of gynecological oncology. However, this opinion has yet to be confirmed by randomized studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19106665     DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328307c7ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol        ISSN: 1040-8746            Impact factor:   3.645


  9 in total

1.  The technique of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology, its introduction into the clinical routine of a gynaecological department and the analysis of the perioperative courses - a German experience.

Authors:  A Kubilay Ertan; Michael Ulbricht; Kirsten Huebner; Alexander Di Liberto
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-06-01

Review 2.  Anesthetic considerations in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Alan D Kaye; Nalini Vadivelu; Nitin Ahuja; Sukanya Mitra; Dan Silasi; Richard D Urman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

3.  Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.

Authors:  Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea; Sarah Adams; Suneel B Bhat; Thomas C Randall
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

5.  Anesthesia considerations for robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Mohamed Badawy; François Béïque; Hani Al-Halal; Tania Azar; Khalid Akkour; Susie K Lau; Walter H Gotlieb
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-25

6.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Can Shi; Yingchun Gao; Yijun Yang; Lei Zhang; Juanpeng Yu; Ting Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 8.  Saudi Urological Association consensus guidelines on the use of robotic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Danny Rabah; Abdullah M Alenizi; Adel Alammari; Ahmed Alasker; Ali A Alqahtani; Bader H Alsaikhan; Fahad A Alyami; Hassan M Alzahrani; Khalid I Alothman; Maher S Moazin; Mofarej Alhgbani; Mohammed Baghdadi; Mohammed F Alotaibi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2022-07-18

9.  Current status of robot-assisted urologic surgery in Saudi Arabia: Trends and opinions from an Internet-based survey.

Authors:  Raed A Azhar; Ahmed A Mobaraki; Hattan M Badr; Noor Nedal; Anmar M Nassir
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.