Literature DB >> 27627955

Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique.

Shailesh P Puntambekar1, Geetanjali A Agarwal2, Saurabh N Joshi2, Neeraj V Rayate2, Seema S Puntambekar2, Ravi M Sathe2.   

Abstract

Minimal access surgery is an accepted treatment modality in cervical cancer. Despite the advantages of laparoscopy, the surgical technique of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is not very commonly performed. Robotic surgery is an emerging field with rapid acceptance because of the 3-dimensional image, dexterity of instruments and autonomy of camera control. We report here our technique of performing robotic radical hysterectomy using the Da Vinci surgical system. Twenty patients with cervical cancer stage 1a1-1b2 underwent robotic radical hysterectomy since December 2009. The median duration of surgery was 122 min, and the average blood loss was 100 ml. Postoperative ureteric fistulas occurred in two patients and were managed by ureteric stenting. The median lymph node retrieval was 30 nodes (range 18-38). We compared our robotic results with our published data on laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Pune technique). We were able to complete all 20 cases robotically with minimal morbidity, and could duplicate our laparoscopic steps in robotic radical hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Laparoscopy; Radical hysterectomy; Robot

Year:  2010        PMID: 27627955     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-010-0224-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  8 in total

1.  [Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri?].

Authors:  M Canis; G Mage; A Wattiez; J L Pouly; H Manhes; M A Bruhat
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Classification of radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Denis Querleu; C Paul Morrow
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?

Authors:  B Sert; V Abeler
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.547

4.  Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Young Tae Kim; Sang Wun Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Soo Jin Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for advanced pelvic cancers: a review of 16 cases.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Reshma J Kudchadkar; Ajit M Gurjar; Ravindra M Sathe; Yogesh C Chaudhari; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Neeraj V Rayate
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig; Leigh Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Mildred Ridgway; Elizabeth N Skinner; Wesley C Fowler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Donald H Chamberlain; Scott A Kamelle; Peter R Johnson; Todd D Tillmanns
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Farr R Nezhat; M Shoma Datta; Connie Liu; Linus Chuang; Konstantin Zakashansky
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Nerve-sparing robotic radical hysterectomy: our technique.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Akhil Lawande; Riddhi Desai; Rahul Kenawadekar; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal Joshi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-07-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.