Literature DB >> 18035405

Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.

Young Tae Kim1, Sang Wun Kim, Woo Jin Hyung, Soo Jin Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Woo Jung Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcome of robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage I cervical carcinoma using the da Vinci surgical system.
METHODS: A retrospective clinical review was performed of ten patients with FIGO stage IA2-IB1 cervical carcinoma who underwent a total robotic approach for definitive surgical treatment. Patient status was estimated in terms of operative morbidity, length of surgery, docking time, estimated blood loss, yield of pelvic lymph node and hospital stay.
RESULTS: All operations were completed robotically with no conversions to laparotomy. Mean operative time was 207 min (range 120 to 240 min). Mean docking time was 26 min (range 10 to 45 min). Mean estimated blood loss was 355 mL. The average number of pelvic lymph nodes resected was 27.6 (range 12 to 52). There were no ureteral injuries or fistula complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for selected patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer is feasible, promising and related with a low morbidity in this pilot study. Only prospective randomized trials will permit the evaluation of potential benefits associated with this surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035405     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  22 in total

1.  Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Yong Wook Jung; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  [Robotic medicine in Germany: quo vadis?].

Authors:  S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The twenty-first century role of Piver-Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective.

Authors:  M Steven Piver; Ali Ghomi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

5.  Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; Seema S Puntambekar; Ravi M Sathe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-11-19

6.  Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet Göçmen; Fatih Şanlıkan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

7.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

8.  Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy procedural guide.

Authors:  Cecelia Boardman; Adam Huggins; Kathryn Hull
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-03-12

9.  A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Anna V Hoekstra; Arati Jairam-Thodla; Diljeet K Singh; Barbara M Buttin; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-27

10.  From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R P Zweemer; W M van Baal; J van de Lande; J C Dijkstra; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.