Literature DB >> 19249082

A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.

M Patrick Lowe1, Donald H Chamberlain, Scott A Kamelle, Peter R Johnson, Todd D Tillmanns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to report a multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy to treat patients with early stage cervical cancer with respect to perioperative outcomes.
METHODS: A multi-institutional robotic surgical consortium consisting of five board-certified gynecologist oncologist in distinct geographical regions of the United States was created to evaluate the utility of robotics for gynecologic surgery (benign and malignant). Between April 2003 and August 2008, a total of 835 patients underwent robotic surgery for benign gynecologic disorders and/or gynecologic malignancies by a surgeon in the consortium. IRB approval was obtained and data was collected in a prospective fashion at each institution. For the purposes of the study, a multi-institutional HIPPA compliant database was then created for all patients that underwent robotic-assisted surgery between the April 2003 and August 2008. This database was queried for all patients who underwent a robotic-assisted type II or III radical hysterectomy for Stage IA1 (+vsi)-IB2 cervical carcinoma. Forty-two patients were identified. Records were then reviewed for demographic data, medical conditions, prior abdominal or pelvic surgeries, and follow-up. The perioperative outcomes analyzed included: operative time (skin-skin), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay, total lymph node count, conversion to laparotomy, and operative complications.
RESULTS: From a database of 835 patients who underwent robotic surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, a total of 42 patients who underwent a robotic-assisted type II (n=10) or type III (n=32) radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer were identified. Demographic data demonstrated a median age of 41 and a median BMI of 25.1. With regard to stage, seven patients (17%) were Stage IA2, twenty-eight patients (67%) were Stage IB1 and six patients (14%) were Stage IB2. There was a single patient with Stage IA1 cervical cancer with vascular space invasion who underwent a type II radical hysterectomy. The overall median operative time was 215 min. The overall median estimated blood loss was 50 cc. No patient received a blood transfusion. The median lymph node count was 25. The median hospital stay was 1 day. Positive lymph nodes were detected in 12% of the patients. Pelvic radiotherapy or chemo-radiation was given to 14% of the patients based on final surgical pathology. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4.8% of the patients and included one conversion to laparotomy (2.4%) and one ureteral injury (2.4%). Postoperative complications were reported in 12% of the patients and included a DVT (2.4%), infection (7.2%), and bladder/urinary tract complication (2.4%) The conversion rate to laparotomy was 2.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy is associated with minimal blood loss, a shortened hospital stay, and few operative complications. Operative time and lymph node yields are acceptable. This data suggests that robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy may offer an alternative to traditional radical hysterectomy. This series contributes to the growing literature on robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy and prospective comparisons with traditional radical hysterectomy are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19249082     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  28 in total

1.  Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Zimmern; Leela Prasad; Ashwin Desouza; Slawomir Marecik; John Park; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: robotic versus open technique outcomes in a contemporary single surgeon series.

Authors:  Meenu Goel; Terrell W Zollinger; David H Moore
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-14

3.  Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.

Authors:  Thomas N Payne; Francis R Dauterive
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

4.  Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Yong Wook Jung; Sang Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Safety and tolerance of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Erin M George; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; William M Burke; Sharyn N Lewin; Eri Prendergast; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  WITHDRAWN: Robotic assisted surgery for gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  Gang Shi; DongHao Lu; Zhihong Liu; Dan Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-11

7.  Robotic radical hysterectomy: applying principles of the laparoscopic Pune technique.

Authors:  Shailesh P Puntambekar; Geetanjali A Agarwal; Saurabh N Joshi; Neeraj V Rayate; Seema S Puntambekar; Ravi M Sathe
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-11-19

Review 8.  Robotic surgery: review of the latest advances, risks, and outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Downes Gastrich; Joseph Barone; Gloria Bachmann; Mark Anderson; Adrian Balica
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-01-21

9.  Comparison of a novel surgical approach for radical hysterectomy: robotic assistance versus open surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Feuer; Benedict Benigno; Lindal Krige; Patricia Alvarez
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-10-09

10.  From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R P Zweemer; W M van Baal; J van de Lande; J C Dijkstra; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2010-04-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.