Literature DB >> 23578828

Differences in knee joint kinematics and forces after posterior cruciate retaining and stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Markus Wünschel1, Jeremi M Leasure, Philipp Dalheimer, Nicole Kraft, Nikolaus Wülker, Otto Müller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining (CR) and -sacrificing (PS) total knee arthroplasties (TKA) are widely-used to treat osteoarthritis of the knee joint. The PS design substitutes the function of the PCL with a cam-spine mechanism which may produce adverse changes to joint kinematics and kinetics.
METHODS: CR- and PS-TKA were performed on 11 human knee specimens. Joint kinematics were measured with a dynamic knee simulator and motion tracking equipment. In-situ loads of the PCL and cam-spine were measured with a robotic force sensor system. Partial weight bearing flexions were simulated and external forces were applied.
RESULTS: The PS-TKA rotated significantly less throughout the whole flexion range compared to the CR-TKA. Femoral roll back was greater in the PS-TKA; however, this was not correlated with lower quadriceps forces. Application of external loads produced significantly different in-situ force profiles between the TKA systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that the PS-design significantly alters kinematics of the knee joint. Our data also suggest the cam-spine mechanism may have little influence on high flexion kinematics (such as femoral rollback) with most of the load burden shared by supporting implant and soft-tissue structures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Forces; Kinematics; Knee joint; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23578828     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  Soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilised, and measured-resection versus gap technique.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Yohei Kawakami; Koji Takayama; Kazunari Ishida; Takehiko Matsushita; Toshihiro Akisue; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique.

Authors:  Clemens Baier; Wolfgang Fitz; Ben Craiovan; Armin Keshmiri; Sebastian Winkler; Robert Springorum; Joachim Grifka; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tak Kang; Sae Kwang Kwon; Juhyun Son; Oh-Ryong Kwon; Jun-Sang Lee; Yong-Gon Koh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release.

Authors:  Kiron K Athwal; Hadi El Daou; Christoph Kittl; Andrew J Davies; David J Deehan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Partial versus Intact Posterior Cruciate Ligament-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Early Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Tie-Bing Qu; Yong Hai; Yuan Lin; Jiang Pan; Zhi-Wei Wang; Liang Wen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.

Authors:  Thomas Comfort; Valborg Baste; Miquel Angel Froufe; Robert Namba; Barbara Bordini; Otto Robertsson; Guy Cafri; Elizabeth Paxton; Art Sedrakyan; Stephen Graves
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Tibiofemoral rotational alignment affects flexion angles in navigated posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Akihiko Toda; Shinya Oka; Kazuki Kodato; Koji Takayama; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Hwei Chi Chong; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Pak Lin Chin; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Navigation-based tibial rotation at 90° of flexion is associated with better range of motion in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hiroshi Sasaki; Koji Takayama; Yuji Hiroshima; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  [Effectiveness comparison of partial versus intact posterior cruciate ligament-retaining in total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining prosthesis].

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Yuan Lin; Shixiang Ren; Tong Chen; Xiaoxiong Zhao; Yang Yu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.