Literature DB >> 27623301

Cross-Sectional Area of the Lumbar Spine Trunk Muscle and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate: A Retrospective Study.

Man Kyu Choi1, Sung Bum Kim, Chang Kyu Park, Hridayesh P Malla, Sung Min Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between trunk muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using pedicle screw fixation (PLIF-PSF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although trunk muscles of the lumbar spine contribute to spinal stability and alignment, effect of trunk muscles on spinal fusion rate and time to fusion is unclear.
METHODS: A total of 192 adult patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent PLIF-PSF at L3-L4 or L4-L5 were included. The MCSA of the flexor (psoas major, PS), extensor (erector spinae, ES; multifidus, MF) were measured using preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 3 segments. Bone union was evaluated using lumbar dynamic plain radiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of bone fusion.
RESULTS: Most PS MCSAs in the fusion group were significantly larger than in the nonfusion group, except for MCSA at the L2-L3 segment (all P<0.05). In cases of ES and MF MCSAs, 4 of 6 segments were significantly large. Multivariate analysis revealed that the PS MCSA at L4-L5 was an independent factor for decreased possibility of nonfusion status in both segments (OR=0.812, P=0.028). Pearson analysis demonstrated that the most trunk MCSAs were negatively correlated with time to fusion for both segments and PS MCSAs exhibited a significant correlation with time to fusion except for MCSA at the L2-L3 segment.
CONCLUSIONS: Trunk MCSAs were significantly larger for a fusion group than a nonfusion group. As trunk MCSAs increased, fusion timing decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27623301     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  9 in total

Review 1.  GAP score potential in predicting post-operative spinal mechanical complications: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  E Quarto; A Zanirato; M Pellegrini; S Vaggi; F Vitali; S Bourret; J C Le Huec; M Formica
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Differences in lumbar paraspinal muscle morphology in patients with sagittal malalignment undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Maximilian Muellner; Henryk Haffer; Erika Chiapparelli; Yusuke Dodo; Ek T Tan; Jennifer Shue; Jiaqi Zhu; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Can fat infiltration in the multifidus muscle be a predictor of postoperative symptoms and complications in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis? A case-control study.

Authors:  Gengyu Han; Da Zou; Xinhang Li; Shuquan Zhang; Zhenxu Li; Siyu Zhou; Wei Li; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.677

4.  The Implications of Paraspinal Muscle Atrophy in Low Back Pain, Thoracolumbar Pathology, and Clinical Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kevin He; Jeffery Head; Nikolaos Mouchtouris; Kevin Hines; Phelan Shea; Richard Schmidt; Christian Hoelscher; Geoffrey Stricsek; James Harrop; Ashwini Sharan
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-09

5.  Oligosaccharide nanomedicine of alginate sodium improves therapeutic results of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cages for degenerative lumbar disease in osteoporosis patients by downregulating serum miR-155.

Authors:  Yang Qu; Zhengming Wang; Haohan Zhou; Mingyang Kang; Rongpeng Dong; Jianwu Zhao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-11-24

6.  A comparison of the bilateral decompression via unilateral approach versus conventional approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease in the elderly.

Authors:  Yifan Huang; Jian Chen; Peng Gao; Changjiang Gu; Jin Fan; Zhiyi Hu; Xiaojian Cao; Guoyong Yin; Wei Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Fat infiltration of paraspinal muscles as an independent risk for bone nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Gengyu Han; Da Zou; Zexiang Liu; Bo Zhang; Chunjie Gong; Siyu Zhou; Wei Li; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Impact of paravertebral muscle in thoracolumbar and lower lumbar regions on outcomes following osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Hasibullah Habibi; Shinji Takahashi; Masatoshi Hoshino; Kazushi Takayama; Ryuichi Sasaoka; Tadao Tsujio; Hiroyuki Yasuda; Fumiaki Kanematsu; Hiroshi Kono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Shoichiro Ohyama; Yusuke Hori; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Comparative study of the paraspinal muscles after OVF between the insufficient union and sufficient union using MRI.

Authors:  Marina Katsu; Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.