Jong Kook Rhim1, Jin Pyeong Jeon2, Jeong Jin Park3, Hyuk Jai Choi2, Young Dae Cho4, Seung Hun Sheen5, Kyung-Sool Jang6. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. 3. Department of Neurology, Konkuk University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 4. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Bundang, Korea. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, Catholic University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors of prolonged hemodynamic instability (HDI) after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Herein, a simplified predictive scoring system for prolonged HDI is proposed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients who had CAS from 2011 to 2016 at a single institution were evaluated. Prolonged HDI was defined as systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg or <90 mm Hg or heart rate <50 beats/min, lasting over 30 minutes despite medical treatments. For the study, clinical data and radiologic data, including plaque morphology and stenosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Prolonged HDI was observed in 21 patients (31.8%). Multivariable analysis revealed that calcification (OR, 6.726; p=0.006), eccentric stenosis (OR, 3.645; p=0.047) and extensive plaque distribution (OR, 7.169; p=0.006) were related to prolonged HDI. According to these results, a simplified scoring scale was proposed based on the summation of points: 2 points for calcified plaque, 2 points for extensive plaque distribution, and 1 point for eccentric stenosis. The percentages of prolonged HDI according to the total score were as follows: score 0, 8.7%; score 1, 20.0%; score 2, 38.5%; score 3, 72.7%; score 4, 66.7%; score 5, 100%. From the analysis, the total score in patients with prolonged HDI was significantly higher than those without prolonged HDI (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged HDI can be associated with calcification of plaque, eccentric stenosis and extensive plaque distribution, and a simplified scoring system enables prediction of prolonged HDI according to our cohort.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the risk factors of prolonged hemodynamic instability (HDI) after carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). Herein, a simplified predictive scoring system for prolonged HDI is proposed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients who had CAS from 2011 to 2016 at a single institution were evaluated. Prolonged HDI was defined as systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg or <90 mm Hg or heart rate <50 beats/min, lasting over 30 minutes despite medical treatments. For the study, clinical data and radiologic data, including plaque morphology and stenosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Prolonged HDI was observed in 21 patients (31.8%). Multivariable analysis revealed that calcification (OR, 6.726; p=0.006), eccentric stenosis (OR, 3.645; p=0.047) and extensive plaque distribution (OR, 7.169; p=0.006) were related to prolonged HDI. According to these results, a simplified scoring scale was proposed based on the summation of points: 2 points for calcified plaque, 2 points for extensive plaque distribution, and 1 point for eccentric stenosis. The percentages of prolonged HDI according to the total score were as follows: score 0, 8.7%; score 1, 20.0%; score 2, 38.5%; score 3, 72.7%; score 4, 66.7%; score 5, 100%. From the analysis, the total score in patients with prolonged HDI was significantly higher than those without prolonged HDI (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Prolonged HDI can be associated with calcification of plaque, eccentric stenosis and extensive plaque distribution, and a simplified scoring system enables prediction of prolonged HDI according to our cohort.
Entities:
Keywords:
Carotid angioplasty and stenting; Hemodynamic instability; Stent
Authors: William H Brooks; Rick R McClure; Michael R Jones; Timothy L Coleman; Linda Breathitt Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Walther N K A van Mook; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Geert Willem Schurink; Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Paul A M Hofman; Peter W de Leeuw Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Erol Baskurt; Klaus D Hagspiel; Michael Finch; C Douglas Phillips; Sirisha R Bollampally; Christopher M Kramer Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: W Morrish; S Grahovac; A Douen; G Cheung; W Hu; R Farb; P Kalapos; R Wee; M Hudon; C Agbi; M Richard Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825