| Literature DB >> 27621691 |
Dan Wang1, Wenjun Liu1, Yan Ren1, Liangliang De1, Donglei Zhang1, Yanrong Yang1, Qiuhua Bao1, Heping Zhang1, Bilige Menghe1.
Abstract
In this study, traditional culture method and 16S rRNA gene analysis were applied to reveal the composition and diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) of fermented cow milk, huruud and urum from Baotou and Bayannur of midwestern Inner Mongolia. Also, the quantitative results of dominant LAB species in three different types of dairy products from Baotou and Bayannur were gained by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) technology. Two hundred and two LAB strains isolated from sixty-six samples were identified and classified into four genera, namely Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and twenty-one species and subspecies. From these isolates, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (32.18%), Lactobacillus plantarum (12.38%) and Leuconosto mesenteroides (11.39%) were considered as the dominated LAB species under the condition of cultivating in MRS and M17 medium. And the q-PCR results revealed that the number of dominant species varied from samples to samples and from region to region. This study clearly shows the composition and diversity of LAB existing in fermented cow milk, huruud and urum, which could be considered as valuable resources for LAB isolation and further probiotic selection.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; lactic acid bacteria; q-PCR; traditional dairy products
Year: 2016 PMID: 27621691 PMCID: PMC5018510 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.4.499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Samples, sampling locations and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) count
| Sample types | Sampling locations | No. of samples | Sample numbers | LAB count (Log CFU/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average (mean±SD) | Range | ||||
| Fermented cow milk | Baotou | 23 | DM1, DM3, DM6, DM8, DM10, DM12, DM13, DM15-DM21, DM23, DM24, DM27-DM32, DM34; | 8.15±0.62 | 6.86~9.13 |
| Bayannur | 25 | BM36-BM38, BM40-BM43, BM45, BM47-BM49, BM52, BM55-BM57, BM59-BM67, BM69; | 8.32±0.62 | 6.74~9.15 | |
| Urum | Baotou | 4 | DM2, DM14, DM25, DM33; BM35, BM39, BM44, BM46, BM50, BM53, BM68; | 8.01±0.77 | 7.07~8.64 |
| Bayannur | 7 | 8.70±0.36 | 8.05~9.14 | ||
| Huruud | Baotou | 5 | DM4, DM5, DM7, DM9, DM22; BM54, BM58; | 7.93±0.49 | 7.32~8.43 |
| Bayannur | 2 | 7.72±1.11 | 6.93~8.50 | ||
DM: samples from Baotou; BM: samples from Bayannur.
Specific primer pairs used for q-PCR
Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc.
| Target bacteria | Primer pairs (Forward/Reverse) | Oligonucleotide sequences (5’-3’) | Product size/bp | Tm (℃) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lp-F | CAGAATTGAGCTGGTGGTGG | 210 | 55 | ( | |
| Lp-R | TGTTACTTTCGCAACCAGAT | ||||
| Lac-F | ATGCGTAAACTTGCAGGAC | 262 | 57 | ( | |
| Lac-R | CAACCTTGAATGGTGGAG | ||||
| Leu-F | ATACAGGCGAACAGGGGATTA | 269 | 45 | ( | |
| Leu-R | GGGTGTAGTTTCTGGGTTTC |
Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showing the phylogenetic placement of representative strains isolated from traditional dairy products. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replications) greater than 50% are given at nodes. Scale bar: 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide.
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) diversity of sampled dairy products
| Lactic acid bacteria | Baotou | Bayannur | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermented cow milk (n=23) | Urum (n=4) | Huruud (n=5) | Fermented cow milk (n=25) | Urum (n=7) | Huruud (n=2) | ||
| - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | 2 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
| 2 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 4 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | - | - | 13 | |
| 6 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
| 1 | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | 4 | |
| 7 | - | 1 | 12 | 5 | - | 25 | |
| 4 | 2 | - | 13 | 2 | - | 21 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | 2 | - | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 9 | 5 | 65 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | - | 9 | 2 | 1 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1 | - | 6 | 2 | 1 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1 | 5 | - | - | 1 | 10 | |
| 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | |
| - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | |
| 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | 2 | |
| - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 1 | |
| Total | 58 | 11 | 12 | 89 | 23 | 9 | 202 |
E., Enterococcus; Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc. n: the number of samples. -: not detected.
Fig. 2.(A) Box plots showing the enumeration of Lb., Lactobacillus; Lac., Lactococcus; Leu., Leuconostoc. *Significant difference (p<0.05).