Literature DB >> 27621292

Capturing patient experience: a qualitative study of implementing real-time feedback in primary care.

Mary Carter1, Antoinette Davey2, Christine Wright3, Natasha Elmore4, Jenny Newbould5, Martin Roland6, John Campbell3, Jenni Burt7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, hospitals have made use of new technologies, such as real-time feedback, to collect patient experience information. This approach is currently rarely used in primary care settings, but may provide practices with a useful tool that enables them to take prompt, focused action to improve their services. AIM: To identify the factors inhibiting and enabling the implementation of real-time feedback in general practices. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Qualitative study embedded within an exploratory trial (July 2014 to February 2015) of a real-time feedback intervention targeting patient experience in general practices in south-west England and Cambridgeshire.
METHOD: Semi-structured interviews (n = 22) and focus groups (n = 4, total of 28 attendees) with practice staff were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically, using a framework based on constructs from normalisation process theory.
RESULTS: Staff engagement with real-time feedback varied considerably, and staff made sense of real-time feedback by comparing it with more familiar feedback modalities. Effective within-team communication was associated with positive attitudes towards real-time feedback. Timing of requests for feedback was important in relation to patient engagement. Real-time feedback may offer potential as a means of informing practice development, perhaps as a component of a wider programme of capturing and responding to patients' comments.
CONCLUSION: Successful implementation of real-time feedback requires effective communication across the practice team to engender thorough engagement. Feedback processes should be carefully introduced to fit with existing patient and practice routines. Future studies should consider making real-time feedback content relevant to specific practice needs, and support participation by all patient groups. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; patient experience; qualitative research; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27621292      PMCID: PMC5072916          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  15 in total

1.  What makes British general practitioners take part in a quality improvement scheme?

Authors:  A Spooner; A Chapple; M Roland
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-07

2.  Obtaining patient feedback at point of service using electronic kiosks.

Authors:  Danae N Dirocco; Susan C Day
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Using real time patient feedback to introduce safety changes.

Authors:  Debra Larsen; Hayley Peters; John Keast; Royal Devon
Journal:  Nurs Manag (Harrow)       Date:  2011-10

4.  Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: a longitudinal case study.

Authors:  Terry Stein; Richard M Frankel; Edward Krupat
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-07

5.  Collective learning, change and improvement in health care: trialling a facilitated learning initiative with general practice teams.

Authors:  Suzanne Bunniss; Francesca Gray; Diane Kelly
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anthea Asprey; John L Campbell; Jenny Newbould; Simon Cohn; Mary Carter; Antoinette Davey; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rachel Reeves; Elizabeth West; David Barron
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice.

Authors:  Olga Boiko; John L Campbell; Natasha Elmore; Antoinette F Davey; Martin Roland; Jenni Burt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Real-time patient survey data during routine clinical activities for rapid-cycle quality improvement.

Authors:  James Lucius Wofford; Claudia L Campos; Robert E Jones; Sheila F Stevens
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-03-12

10.  Patients' use and views of real-time feedback technology in general practice.

Authors:  Christine Wright; Antoinette Davey; Natasha Elmore; Mary Carter; Luke Mounce; Ed Wilson; Jenni Burt; Martin Roland; John Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Friends and Family Test in general practice in England: a qualitative study of the views of staff and patients.

Authors:  Tommaso Manacorda; Bob Erens; Nick Black; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online alternative to face-to-face consultation in general practice: a mixed-methods study of webGP in six Devon practices.

Authors:  Mary Carter; Emily Fletcher; Anna Sansom; Fiona C Warren; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Khanbhai; Kelsey Flott; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Implementing online patient feedback in a 'special measures' acute hospital: A case study using Normalisation Process Theory.

Authors:  Rebecca Baines; Frazer Underwood; Kim O'Keeffe; Jessica Saunders; Ray B Jones
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Identifying factors that promote and limit the effective use of real-time patient experience feedback: a mixed-methods study in secondary care.

Authors:  Mustafa Khanbhai; Kelsey Flott; Dave Manton; Stephanie Harrison-White; Robert Klaber; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to develop an intervention to improve referral and uptake rates for self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes in UK primary care.

Authors:  Jessica Turner; Graham Martin; Nicky Hudson; Liz Shaw; Lisa Huddlestone; Christina Weis; Alison Northern; Sally Schreder; Melanie Davies; Helen Eborall
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Effect of Real-Time Feedback Devices on Primary Care Patient Experience Scores: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Philips; Nina Dadlez; Melissa Fazzari; Shawn Samuel; William Southern; Moonseong Heo; Namita Azad; Michael Drasher; Michael L Rinke
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-02-26

8.  Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States.

Authors:  Rachel C Forcino; Paul J Barr; A James O'Malley; Roger Arend; Molly G Castaldo; Elissa M Ozanne; Sanja Percac-Lima; Cheryl D Stults; Ming Tai-Seale; Rachel Thompson; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Huddlestone; Jessica Turner; Helen Eborall; Nicky Hudson; Melanie Davies; Graham Martin
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.