Tommaso Manacorda 1 , Bob Erens 1 , Nick Black 1 , Nicholas Mays 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) was introduced into general practices in England in 2015 to provide staff with information on patients' views of their experience of care. AIM: To examine the views of practice staff and patients of the FFT, how the results are used, and to recommend improvements. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of a national representative sample of 42 general practices. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 43 clinicians, 48 practice managers, and 27 patient representatives. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although the FFT imposed little extra work on practices, it was judged to provide little additional insight over existing methods and to have had minimal impact on improving quality. Staff lacked confidence in the accuracy of the results given the lack of a representative sample and the risk of bias. The FFT question was judged to be inappropriate as in many areas there was no alternative practice for patients to choose, patients' individual needs would not be the same as those of their friends and relatives, and an overall assessment failed to identify any specific aspects of good- or poor-quality care. Despite being intended to support local quality improvement, there was widespread unease about the FFT, with many responders perceiving it as a tool for national bodies to monitor general practices. CONCLUSION: If the use of a single-item questionnaire is to continue, changes should be made to the wording. It should be focused on stimulating local quality improvement, and practice staff should be supported to use the results effectively. © British Journal of General Practice 2017.
BACKGROUND: The Friends and Family Test (FFT) was introduced into general practices in England in 2015 to provide staff with information on patients ' views of their experience of care. AIM: To examine the views of practice staff and patients of the FFT, how the results are used, and to recommend improvements. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study of a national representative sample of 42 general practices. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews with 43 clinicians, 48 practice managers, and 27 patient representatives. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Although the FFT imposed little extra work on practices, it was judged to provide little additional insight over existing methods and to have had minimal impact on improving quality. Staff lacked confidence in the accuracy of the results given the lack of a representative sample and the risk of bias. The FFT question was judged to be inappropriate as in many areas there was no alternative practice for patients to choose, patients ' individual needs would not be the same as those of their friends and relatives, and an overall assessment failed to identify any specific aspects of good- or poor-quality care. Despite being intended to support local quality improvement, there was widespread unease about the FFT, with many responders perceiving it as a tool for national bodies to monitor general practices. CONCLUSION: If the use of a single-item questionnaire is to continue, changes should be made to the wording . It should be focused on stimulating local quality improvement, and practice staff should be supported to use the results effectively. © British Journal of General Practice 2017.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Friends and Family Test; general practice; patient experience; qualitative research; quality improvement; surveys and questionnaires
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2017
PMID： 28450345 PMCID： PMC5409431 DOI： 10.3399/bjgp17X690617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Gen Pract ISSN： 0960-1643 Impact factor: 5.386