Literature DB >> 2761784

Significance of shape and size of the stimulating coil in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

K M Rösler1, C W Hess, R Heckmann, H P Ludin.   

Abstract

Three different stimulating coil designs were evaluated for magnetic motor cortex stimulation by comparing threshold stimulus intensities at different sites over the scalp for exciting upper and lower limb muscles. Little difference was found between stimulation characteristics of two circular coils of different size, the smaller coil delivering slightly more focal stimuli. A twin coil composed of two single circular coils in series arranged side-by-side, produced significantly more powerful and more focal stimuli. It proved to be superior for exciting the leg muscles, in that less output energy was needed. For all coils, the orientation of the inducing current over the presumed motor area was the most critical stimulation parameter, and a sagittal current in anterior direction or coronal towards the stimulated hemisphere was optimal for the upper limb or lower limb muscles, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2761784     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90711-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  11 in total

1.  Central motor conduction in a family with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with pyramidal signs (HMSN V).

Authors:  A Schnider; C W Hess; S Koppi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Transcranial stimulation of the human frontal eye field by magnetic pulses.

Authors:  R M Müri; C W Hess; O Meienberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor cortical representation of the diaphragm in man.

Authors:  D Maskill; K Murphy; A Mier; M Owen; A Guz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Intracortical circuits, sensorimotor integration and plasticity in human motor cortical projections to muscles of the lower face.

Authors:  G Pilurzi; A Hasan; T A Saifee; E Tolu; J C Rothwell; F Deriu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Uncrossed cortico-muscular projections in humans are abundant to facial muscles of the upper and lower face, but may differ between sexes.

Authors:  Urs Fischer; Christian W Hess; Kai M Rösler
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Electrophysiological assessment of central and peripheral motor routes to the lingual muscles.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; J Mathis; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Influence of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the execution of memorised sequences of saccades in man.

Authors:  R M Müri; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

Authors:  S Beer; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.