Literature DB >> 15654551

Uncrossed cortico-muscular projections in humans are abundant to facial muscles of the upper and lower face, but may differ between sexes.

Urs Fischer1, Christian W Hess, Kai M Rösler.   

Abstract

It is a popular concept in clinical neurology that muscles of the lower face receive predominantly crossed cortico-bulbar motor input, whereas muscles of the upper face receive additional ipsilateral, uncrossed input. To test this notion, we used focal transcranial magnetic brain stimulation to quantify crossed and uncrossed cortico-muscular projections to 6 different facial muscles (right and left Mm. frontalis, nasalis, and orbicularis oris) in 36 healthy right-handed volunteers (15 men, 21 women, mean age 25 years). Uncrossed input was present in 78% to 92% of the 6 examined muscles. The mean uncrossed: crossed response amplitude ratios were 0.74/0.65 in right/left frontalis, 0.73/0.59 in nasalis, and 0.54/0.71 in orbicularis oris; ANOVA p>0.05). Judged by the sizes of motor evoked potentials, the cortical representation of the 3 muscles was similar. The amount of uncrossed projections was different between men and women, since men had stronger left-to-left projections and women stronger right-to-right projections. We conclude that the amount of uncrossed pyramidal projections is not different for muscles of the upper from those of the lower face. The clinical observation that frontal muscles are often spared in central facial palsies must, therefore, be explained differently. Moreover, gender specific lateralization phenomena may not only be present for higher level behavioural functions, but may also affect simple systems on a lower level of motor hierarchy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15654551     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0592-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

1.  Corticobular connexions to the pons and lower brain-stem in man: an anatomical study.

Authors:  H G KUYPERS
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Patrick Dubach; Adrian G Guggisberg; Kai M Rösler; Christian W Hess; Johannes Mathis
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions.

Authors:  U Dimberg; L O Lundquist
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Magnetic transcranial and electrical stylomastoidal stimulation of the facial motor pathways in Bell's palsy: time course and relevance of electrophysiological parameters.

Authors:  F X Glocker; M R Magistris; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-04

5.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee.

Authors:  C W Hess; K R Mills; N M Murray
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1986-11-11       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Electrodiagnostic study of trigeminal nerve. Orbicularis oculi reflex and masseter reflex in trigeminal neuralgia, paratrigeminal syndrome, and other lesions of the trigeminal nerve.

Authors:  J Kimura; R L Rodnitzky; M W Van Allen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans.

Authors:  R W Buck; V J Savin; R E Miller; W F Caul
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1972-09

8.  Facial asymmetry in posed and spontaneous expressions of emotion.

Authors:  J C Borod; E Koff; B White
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  The asymmetry of facial actions is inconsistent with models of hemispheric specialization.

Authors:  J C Hager; P Ekman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Electrophysiological characterization of pre- and postoperative facial nerve function in patients with acoustic neuroma using electrical and magnetic stimulation techniques.

Authors:  K M Rösler; W K Jenni; U D Schmid; C W Hess
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  4 in total

1.  Superconditioning TMS for examining upper motor neuron function in MND.

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Eufrosina Young; Mary Lou Watson; Dongliang Wang; Natalia Alexeeva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Representation of facial muscles in human motor cortex.

Authors:  Guillermo O Paradiso; Danny I Cunic; Carolyn A Gunraj; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Geometric morphometrics for the study of facial expressions in non-human animals, using the domestic cat as an exemplar.

Authors:  Lauren R Finka; Stelio P Luna; Juliana T Brondani; Yorgos Tzimiropoulos; John McDonagh; Mark J Farnworth; Marcello Ruta; Daniel S Mills
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.