Literature DB >> 1756793

Transcranial stimulation of the human frontal eye field by magnetic pulses.

R M Müri1, C W Hess, O Meienberg.   

Abstract

Single transcranial magnetic pulsed stimuli were applied over the cortical area of the putative right frontal eye field (FEF) in 11 healthy subjects. An especially designed figure of eight shaped twin coil was used, to focus the stimulus, the strength of which was adjusted to the individual motor threshold of the left hand muscles. Eye positions and movements were recorded by an infrared reflection technique. Three different experiments were performed: 1. Stimulation during different primary gaze position did not evoke any discernible eye movement. 2. Stimulation just prior to visually elicited horizontal saccades did not cause a significant alteration of the latency, velocity, or amplitude of the saccades. 3. Only stimulation during an antisaccade task induced a significant latency prolongation, when the stimulus was applied between 50 to 90 ms after the target flashed up. This latency prolongation was found in all subjects for the antisaccades to the right, with a statistically significant average latency difference of +66 +/- 55.5 ms. In contrast, the antisaccades to the left were prolonged in the female subjects only by an average of +98 +/- 41.8 ms (p = 0.0064), whereas in the male subjects they did not alter with stimulation (average difference: -3 +/- 41.9 ms, p = 0.753). Significant latency prolongations were only obtained when the magnetic FEF stimuli were applied within a vulnerable period, which varied from subject to subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1756793     DOI: 10.1007/bf00231057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Motor function of the tectal and tegmental area.

Authors:  W R HESS; S BUERGI; V BUCHER
Journal:  Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol       Date:  1946

2.  Significance of shape and size of the stimulating coil in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  K M Rösler; C W Hess; R Heckmann; H P Ludin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1989-05-22       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Investigation of facial motor pathways by electrical and magnetic stimulation: sites and mechanisms of excitation.

Authors:  K M Rösler; C W Hess; U D Schmid
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements.

Authors:  C J Bruce; M E Goldberg; M C Bushnell; G B Stanton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sex differences and eye movements.

Authors:  M de Bonis; E Freixa i Baqué
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.328

7.  The predictability of saccadic latency in a novel voluntary oculomotor task.

Authors:  P E Hallett; B D Adams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Eye movements evoked by stimulation of frontal eye fields.

Authors:  D A Robinson; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of cerebral cortex in the generation of voluntary saccades: a positron emission tomographic study.

Authors:  P T Fox; J M Fox; M E Raichle; R M Burde
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Versive eye movements elicited by cortical stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  J Godoy; H Lüders; D S Dinner; H H Morris; E Wyllie
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  19 in total

1.  Stimulation of the frontal eye field reveals persistent effective connectivity after controlled behavior.

Authors:  Rei Akaishi; Yosuke Morishima; Vivian P Rajeswaren; Shigeki Aoki; Katsuyuki Sakai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of macaque frontal eye fields decreases saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Annelies Gerits; Christian C Ruff; Olivier Guipponi; Nicole Wenderoth; Jon Driver; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation during positron emission tomography: a new method for studying connectivity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  T Paus; R Jech; C J Thompson; R Comeau; T Peters; A C Evans
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Near and far space: Understanding the neural mechanisms of spatial attention.

Authors:  Alison R Lane; Keira Ball; Daniel T Smith; Thomas Schenk; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Eye movement disorders after frontal eye field lesions in humans.

Authors:  S Rivaud; R M Müri; B Gaymard; A I Vermersch; C Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the execution of memorised sequences of saccades in man.

Authors:  R M Müri; K M Rösler; C W Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  When looking back to nothing goes back to nothing.

Authors:  Andrea L Wantz; Corinna S Martarelli; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-11-09

9.  Distinct control of initiation and metrics of memory-guided saccades and vergence by the FEF: a TMS study.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Zoi Kapoula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The human frontal oculomotor cortical areas contribute asymmetrically to motor planning in a gap saccade task.

Authors:  Paul van Donkelaar; Yu Lin; David Hewlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.