Literature DB >> 27614901

Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Niccolò Napoli1, Emanuele F Kauffmann1, Francesca Menonna1, Vittorio Grazio Perrone1, Stefania Brozzetti2, Ugo Boggi3.   

Abstract

Robotic assistance improves surgical dexterity in minimally invasive operations, especially when fine dissection and multiple sutures are required. As such, robotic assistance could be rewarding in the setting of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD). RPD was implemented at a high volume center with preemptive experience in advanced laparoscopy. Indications, surgical technique, and results of RPD are discussed against the background of current literature. RPD was performed in 112 consecutive patients. Conversion to open surgery was required in three patients, despite nine required segmental resection and reconstruction of the superior mesenteric/portal vein. No patient was converted to laparoscopy. A pancreato-jejunostomy was created in 106 patients (94.6 %), using either a duct-to-mucosa (n = 82; 73.2 %) or an invaginating (n = 24; 21.4 %) technique. Pancreato-gastrostomy was performed in one patient, the pancreatic duct was occluded in two patients, and a pancreatico-cutaneous fistula was created in three patients. Mean operative time was 526.3 ± 102.4 in the entire cohort and reduced significantly over the course of time. Experience was also associated with reduced rates of delayed gastric emptying and increased proportion of malignant tumor histology. Ninety day mortality was 3.6 %. Postoperative complications occurred in 83 patients (74.1 %) with a median comprehensive complication index of 20.9 (0-30.8). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula occurred in 19.6 % of the patients. No grade C pancreatic fistula was noted in the last 72 consecutive patients. RPD is safely feasible in selected patients. Implementation of RPD requires sound experience with open pancreatoduodenectomy and advanced laparoscopic procedures, as well as specific training with the robotic platform.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robot; da Vinci

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27614901     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  39 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative recovery and outcomes--what are we measuring and for whom?

Authors:  A J Bowyer; C F Royse
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 2.  Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

Authors:  N Tjarda van Heek; Koert F D Kuhlmann; Rob J Scholten; Steve M M de Castro; Olivier R C Busch; Thomas M van Gulik; Huug Obertop; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Are Valuable in Pancreas Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Katherine A Morgan; William P Lancaster; Megan L Walters; Stefanie M Owczarski; Carlee A Clark; Julie R McSwain; David B Adams
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Daniel P Nussbaum; Rebekah R White; Sabino Zani; Paul J Mosca; Dan G Blazer; Bryan M Clary; Theodore N Pappas; Douglas S Tyler; Alexander Perez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Overuse of surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer. A nationwide analysis in Italy.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Giovanni Capretti; Giuditta Callea; Elena Cantù; Flavia Carle; Raffaele Pezzilli
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Robotic suture of a large caval injury caused by endo-GIA stapler malfunction during laparoscopic wedge resection of liver segments VII and VIII en-bloc with the right hepatic vein.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Carlo Moretto; Fabio Vistoli; Simone D'Imporzano; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.442

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Extending indications for islet autotransplantation in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Paola Maffi; Rita Nano; Alessandro Zerbi; Massimo Venturini; Raffaella Melzi; Alessia Mercalli; Paola Magistretti; Marina Scavini; Renato Castoldi; Michele Carvello; Marco Braga; Alessandro Del Maschio; Antonio Secchi; Carlo Staudacher; Lorenzo Piemonti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  [Preservation of the pylorus in duodenocephalopancreatectomy in pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma].

Authors:  F Mosca; P C Giulianotti; T Balestracci; U Boggi; D Giardino; G Di Candio; G Rossi; G Fornaciari
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  1994

10.  Prognostic implications of tumor invasion or adhesion to peripancreatic vessels in resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Marco Del Chiaro; Chiara Croce; Fabio Vistoli; Stefano Signori; Carlo Moretto; Gabriella Amorese; Salvatore Mazzeo; Carla Cappelli; Daniela Campani; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  10 in total

1.  A propensity score-matched analysis of robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer based on margin status.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Francesca Menonna; Sara Iacopi; Carlo Lombardo; Juri Bernardini; Gabriella Amorese; Andrea Cacciato Insilla; Niccola Funel; Daniela Campani; Carla Cappelli; Davide Caramella; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Francesca Menonna; Francesca Costa; Sara Iacopi; Gabriella Amorese; Serena Giorgi; Angelo Baggiani; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases].

Authors:  Rong Liu; Guo-Dong Zhao; Wen-Bo Tang; Ke-di Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Ming-Gen Hu; Cheng-Gang Li; Xiang-Long Tan; Xuan Zhang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2018-02-20

5.  Feasibility of "cold" triangle robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Michael Ginesini; Cesare Gianfaldoni; Fabio Asta; Alice Salamone; Gabriella Amorese; Fabio Vistoli; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Resection or repair of large peripancreatic arteries during robotic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Concetta Cacace; Francesca Menonna; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-18

7.  Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison.

Authors:  Benedetto Ielpo; Riccardo Caruso; Hipolito Duran; Eduardo Diaz; Isabel Fabra; Luis Malavé; Yolanda Quijano; Emilio Vicente
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-03-26

8.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation.

Authors:  Charlotte Friederieke Müller-Debus; Michael Thomaschewski; Markus Zimmermann; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 9.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Learning curves for robotic pancreatic surgery-from distal pancreatectomy to pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Bor-Uei Shyr; Shih-Chin Chen; Yi-Ming Shyr; Shin-E Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.