Literature DB >> 35881243

Feasibility of "cold" triangle robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Emanuele F Kauffmann1, Niccolò Napoli2, Michael Ginesini2, Cesare Gianfaldoni2, Fabio Asta2, Alice Salamone2, Gabriella Amorese3, Fabio Vistoli2, Ugo Boggi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Triangle pancreatoduodenectomy adds to the conventional procedure the en bloc removal of the retroperitoneal lympho-neural tissue included in the triangular area bounded by the common hepatic artery (CHA), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), and the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein. We herein aim to show the feasibility of "cold" triangle robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (C-Tr-RPD) for pancreatic cancer (PDAC).
METHODS: Cold dissection corresponds to sharp arterial divestment performed using only the tips of robotic scissors. After division of the gastroduodenal artery, triangle dissection begins by lateral-to-medial divestment of the CHA and anterior-to-posterior clearance of the right side of the celiac trunk. Next, after a wide Kocher maneuver, the origin of the SMA, and the celiac trunk are identified. After mobilization of the first jejunal loop and attached mesentery, the SMA is identified at the level of the first jejunal vein and is divested along the right margin working in a distal-to-proximal direction. Vein resection and reconstruction can be performed as required. C-Tr-RPD was considered feasible if triangle dissection was successfully completed without conversion to open surgery or need to use energy devices. Postoperative complications and pathology results are presented in detail.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven consecutive C-Tr-RPDs were successfully performed. There were three conversions to open surgery (2.3%), because of pneumoperitoneum intolerance (n = 2) and difficult digestive reconstruction. Thirty-four patients (26.7%) required associated vascular procedures. No pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery was observed. Twenty-eight patients (22.0%) developed severe postoperative complications (≥ grade III). Overall 90-day mortality was 7.1%, declining to 2.3% after completion of the learning curve. The median number of examined lymph nodes was 42 (33-51). The rate of R1 resection (7 margins < 1 mm) was 44.1%.
CONCLUSION: C-Tr-RPD is feasible, carries a risk of surgical complications commensurate to the magnitude of the procedure, and improves staging of PDAC.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mesopancreas; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robot assisted; Robotic; Triangle

Year:  2022        PMID: 35881243     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  47 in total

1.  Impact of Resection Margin Status in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: a National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Christof Kaltenmeier; Ibrahim Nassour; Richard S Hoehn; Sidrah Khan; Alison Althans; David A Geller; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer Zureikat; Samer Tohme
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A clinicopathologic study on neural invasion in cancer of the pancreatic head.

Authors:  T Nagakawa; M Kayahara; K Ueno; T Ohta; I Konishi; N Ueda; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Greater lymph node retrieval and lymph node ratio impacts survival in resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Katelin A Mirkin; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Joyce Wong
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Surgical technique and results of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) in pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  M Adham; J Singhirunnusorn
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Vincent P Groot; Neda Rezaee; Wenchuan Wu; John L Cameron; Elliot K Fishman; Ralph H Hruban; Matthew J Weiss; Lei Zheng; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Pancreatic resection for cancer-the Heidelberg technique.

Authors:  Martin Schneider; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Major Complications Independently Increase Long-Term Mortality After Pancreatoduodenectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  M Sandini; K J Ruscic; C R Ferrone; M Qadan; M Eikermann; A L Warshaw; K D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  EMT and dissemination precede pancreatic tumor formation.

Authors:  Andrew D Rhim; Emily T Mirek; Nicole M Aiello; Anirban Maitra; Jennifer M Bailey; Florencia McAllister; Maximilian Reichert; Gregory L Beatty; Anil K Rustgi; Robert H Vonderheide; Steven D Leach; Ben Z Stanger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 10.  Role of Node Dissection in Pancreatic Tumor Resection.

Authors:  Mary Dillhoff; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.