Literature DB >> 18980906

Motor programming when sequencing multiple elements of the same duration.

Curt E Magnuson1, Donald A Robin, David L Wright.   

Abstract

Motor programming at the self-select paradigm was adopted in 2 experiments to examine the processing demands of independent processes. One process (INT) is responsible for organizing the internal features of the individual elements in a movement (e.g., response duration). The 2nd process (SEQ) is responsible for placing the elements into the proper serial order before execution. Participants in Experiment 1 performed tasks involving 1 key press or sequences of 4 key presses of the same duration. Implementing INT and SEQ was more time consuming for key-pressing sequences than for single key-press tasks. Experiment 2 examined whether the INT costs resulting from the increase in sequence length observed in Experiment 1 resulted from independent planning of each sequence element or via a separate "multiplier" process that handled repetitions of elements of the same duration. Findings from Experiment 2, in which participants performed single key presses or double or triple key sequences of the same duration, suggested that INT is involved with the independent organization of each element contained in the sequence. Researchers offer an elaboration of the 2-process account of motor programming to incorporate the present findings and the findings from other recent sequence-learning research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18980906     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.40.6.532-544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  6 in total

1.  Using the self-select paradigm to delineate the nature of speech motor programming.

Authors:  David L Wright; Don A Robin; Jooyhun Rhee; Amber Vaculin; Adam Jacks; Frank H Guenther; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Charles H Shea; David L Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

3.  Sequence learning is driven by improvements in motor planning.

Authors:  Giacomo Ariani; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The bottleneck of the psychological refractory period effect involves timing of response initiation rather than response selection.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Dana Maslovat; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

5.  Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses.

Authors:  S R Alouche; G N Sant'Anna; G Biagioni; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.590

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.