Literature DB >> 2761406

Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.

H H Marmurek.   

Abstract

The decision that two words are identical is made more quickly than the decision that two non-words are identical. This familiarity effect was shown to be larger in a simultaneous matching task than in a sequential matching task. In the simultaneous task, two words were not matched as quickly as a single letter and a letter in a predesignated location within a word. The latter finding rules out a perceptual unitization account of the familiarity effect (Silverman, 1985). The familiarity effect was interpreted to be due to the facilitated encoding of a comparison item when a holistic cognitive unit representing the target is activated in memory.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2761406     DOI: 10.3758/bf03202622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Familiarity effects in visual information processing.

Authors:  L E Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Processing letters in words at different levels.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

3.  Evidence for processing of constituent singleand multiletter codes: Support for multilevel coding in word perception.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Frank R Vellutino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02-28

4.  Perceptual interactions in two-word displays: familiarity and similarity effects.

Authors:  J L McClelland; M C Mozer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  F M Marchetti; D J Mewhort
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

6.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.

Authors:  D LaBerge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Investigating the boundaries of reading units: letter detection in misspelled words.

Authors:  A F Healy; A Drewnowski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?

Authors:  J L Santee; H E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Two types of word superiority effects in a speeded matching task.

Authors:  W P Silverman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

10.  Reinstating the original principles of Proctor's unified theory for matching-task phenomena: an evaluation of Krueger and Shapiro's reformulation.

Authors:  R W Proctor; K V Rao
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  2 in total

1.  Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Is the masked priming same-different task a pure measure of prelexical processing?

Authors:  Andrew N Kelly; Walter J B van Heuven; Nicola J Pitchford; Timothy Ledgeway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.