Literature DB >> 21331869

Processing letters in words at different levels.

H H Marmurek1.   

Abstract

Subjects indicated whether two letters, two words, or a letter and the first letter of a word were the same. Letter targets were matched more quickly than word targets when the stimuli were presented simultaneously. When the target and comparison stimuli were separated by a 3-sec interval, word targets were matched more quickly than a letter and a letter in a word. It was also shown that the physical similarity of the targets and comparison stimuli had a greater effect in the simultaneous matching conditions. These findings are consistent with a model of word processing in which letters are individually compared prior to word identification at a physical level of processing. At a higher level of processing, words may be encoded as a unit, and the identification of the letters within the word may require a decoding of the word unit.

Year:  1977        PMID: 21331869     DOI: 10.3758/BF03209194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  5 in total

1.  Three interrelated problems in reading: A review.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-03

2.  Process of recognizing tachistoscopically presented words.

Authors:  D E Rumelhart; P Siple
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Visual information and redundancy in reading.

Authors:  M C Thompson; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-04

4.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters.

Authors:  M I Posner; S J Boies; W H Eichelman; R L Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-01

5.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08
  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Memory for objects and parts.

Authors:  C Ankrum; J Palmer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

2.  Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

3.  Part-whole relationships in the processing of small visual patterns.

Authors:  N F Johnson; M Turner-Lyga; B S Pettegrew
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

4.  Whole and part comparisons of words and nonwords.

Authors:  H H Marmurek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

5.  Letters and words in word identification.

Authors:  J A Umansky; S M Chambers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-09

6.  Repeating the target neither speeds nor slows its detection: evidence for independent channels in letter processing.

Authors:  L E Krueger; R G Shapiro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07

7.  Absence of lexical and orthographic effects in a same-different task.

Authors:  K I Forster
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.