Literature DB >> 27613001

Estimating population exposure to ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in the United States - Part II: Source apportionment and cancer risk assessment.

Jie Zhang1, Peng Wang1, Jingyi Li1, Pauline Mendola2, Seth Sherman3, Qi Ying4.   

Abstract

A revised Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model was developed to simulate the emission, reactions, transport, deposition and gas-to-particle partitioning processes of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), as described in Part I of the two-part series. The updated CMAQ model was applied in this study to quantify the contributions of different emission sources to the predicted PAH concentrations and excess cancer risk in the United States (US) in 2011. The cancer risk in the continental US due to inhalation exposure of outdoor naphthalene (NAPH) and seven larger carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) was predicted to be significant. The incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) exceeds 1×10-5 in many urban and industrial areas. Exposure to PAHs was estimated to result in 5704 (608-10,800) excess lifetime cancer cases. Point sources not related with energy generation and the oil and gas processes account for approximately 31% of the excess cancer cases, followed by non-road engines with 18.6% contributions. Contributions of residential wood combustion (16.2%) are similar to that of transportation-related sources (mostly motor vehicles with small contributions from railway and marine vessels; 13.4%). The oil and gas industry emissions, although large contributors to high concentrations of cPAHs regionally, are only responsible of 4.3% of the excess cancer cases, which is similar to the contributions of non-US sources (6.8%) and non-point sources (7.2%). The power generation units pose the most minimal impact on excess cancer risk, with contributions of approximately 2.3%.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benzo[α]pyrene; Cancer risk assessment; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Source apportionment; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27613001      PMCID: PMC6205197          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  27 in total

1.  Atmospheric concentrations, sources and gas-particle partitioning of PAHs in Beijing after the 29th Olympic Games.

Authors:  Wan-Li Ma; De-Zhi Sun; Wei-Guo Shen; Meng Yang; Hong Qi; Li-Yan Liu; Ji-Min Shen; Yi-Fan Li
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Impact of gas/particle partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds on source apportionment with positive matrix factorization.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Michael P Hannigan; Kelley C Barsanti
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources.

Authors:  Marek Tobiszewski; Jacek Namieśnik
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere of Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Yingjun Chen; Yanli Feng; Shengchun Xiong; Dongyan Liu; Gang Wang; Guoying Sheng; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Contribution of biomass burning to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at three European background sites.

Authors:  Manolis Mandalakis; Orjan Gustafsson; Tomas Alsberg; Anna-Lena Egebäck; Christopher M Reddy; Li Xu; Jana Klanova; Ivan Holoubek; Euripides G Stephanou
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  PAH molecular diagnostic ratios applied to atmospheric sources: a critical evaluation using two decades of source inventory and air concentration data from the UK.

Authors:  Athanasios Katsoyiannis; Andrew J Sweetman; Kevin C Jones
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the indoor and outdoor air of three cities in the U.S.

Authors:  Yelena Y Naumova; Steven J Eisenreich; Barbara J Turpin; Clifford P Weisel; Maria T Morandi; Steven D Colome; Lisa A Totten; Thomas H Stock; Arthur M Winer; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Jaymin Kwon; Derek Shendell; Jennifer Jones; Silvia Maberti; Steven J Wall
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Characteristics, toxicity, and source apportionment of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in road dust of Ulsan, Korea.

Authors:  Trang T T Dong; Byeong-Kyu Lee
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air.

Authors:  Carl-Elis Boström; Per Gerde; Annika Hanberg; Bengt Jernström; Christer Johansson; Titus Kyrklund; Agneta Rannug; Margareta Törnqvist; Katarina Victorin; Roger Westerholm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Adsorptive and absorptive contributions to the gas-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: state of knowledge and recommended parametrization for modeling.

Authors:  Rainer Lohmann; Gerhard Lammel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  9 in total

1.  Estimating population exposure to ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in the United States - Part I: Model development and evaluation.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Jingyi Li; Peng Wang; Gang Chen; Pauline Mendola; Seth Sherman; Qi Ying
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Domestic Exposures to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in a Houston, Texas, Environmental Justice Neighborhood.

Authors:  Garett T Sansom; Katie R Kirsch; Kahler W Stone; Thomas J McDonald; Jennifer A Horney
Journal:  Environ Justice       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Integrated process analysis retrieval of changes in ground-level ozone and fine particulate matter during the COVID-19 outbreak in the coastal city of Kannur, India.

Authors:  Fei Ye; Dipesh Rupakheti; Lin Huang; Nishanth T; Satheesh Kumar Mk; Lin Li; Valsaraj Kt; Jianlin Hu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 9.988

4.  Photocatalytic Oxidation of PLA/TiO2-Composite Films for Indoor Air Purification.

Authors:  Pattamaphon Chanklom; Torpong Kreetachat; Rotruedee Chotigawin; Kowit Suwannahong
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Comparing residential contamination in a Houston environmental justice neighborhood before and after Hurricane Harvey.

Authors:  Jennifer A Horney; Gaston A Casillas; Erin Baker; Kahler W Stone; Katie R Kirsch; Krisa Camargo; Terry L Wade; Thomas J McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The relationship of smoking to cg05575921 methylation in blood and saliva DNA samples from several studies.

Authors:  Kelsey Dawes; Allan Andersen; Rachel Reimer; James A Mills; Eric Hoffman; Jeffrey D Long; Shelly Miller; Robert Philibert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Parallel Transformations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Body and in the Atmosphere.

Authors:  Amy I H Hrdina; Ishwar N Kohale; Simran Kaushal; Jamie Kelly; Noelle E Selin; Bevin P Engelward; Jesse H Kroll
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Association between dried fruit intake and pan-cancers incidence risk: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Chen Jin; Rui Li; Tuo Deng; Zixia Lin; Haoqi Li; Yan Yang; Qing Su; Jingxian Wang; Yi Yang; Juejin Wang; Gang Chen; Yi Wang
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-18

9.  Global Cancer Risk From Unregulated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Jamie M Kelly; Peter D Ivatt; Mathew J Evans; Jesse H Kroll; Amy I H Hrdina; Ishwar N Kohale; Forest M White; Bevin P Engelward; Noelle E Selin
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-09-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.