Literature DB >> 21859122

PAH molecular diagnostic ratios applied to atmospheric sources: a critical evaluation using two decades of source inventory and air concentration data from the UK.

Athanasios Katsoyiannis1, Andrew J Sweetman, Kevin C Jones.   

Abstract

Molecular diagnostic ratios (MDRs)-the ratios of defined pairs of individual compounds-have been widely used as markers of different source categories of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, it is well-known that variations in combustion conditions and environmental degradation processes can cause substantial variability in the emission and degradation of individual compounds, potentially undermining the application of MDRs as reliable source apportionment tools. The United Kingdom produces a national inventory of atmospheric emissions of PAHs, and has an ambient air monitoring program at a range of rural, semirural, urban, and industrial sites. The inventory and the monitoring data are available over the past 20 years (1990-2010), a time frame that has seen known changes in combustion type and source. Here we assess 5 MDRs that have been used in the literature as source markers. We examine the spatial and temporal variability in the ratios and consider whether they are responsive to known differences in source strength and types between sites (on rural-urban gradients) and to underlying changes in national emissions since 1990. We conclude that the use of these 5 MDRs produces contradictory results and that they do not respond to known differences (in time and space) in atmospheric emission sources. For example, at a site near a motorway and far from other evident emission sources, the use of MDRs suggests "non-traffic" emissions. The ANT/(ANT + PHE) ratio is strongly seasonal at some sites; it is the most susceptible MDR to atmospheric processes, so these results illustrate how weathering in the environment will undermine the effectiveness of MDRs as markers of source(s). We conclude that PAH MDRs can exhibit spatial and temporal differences, but they are not valid markers of known differences in source categories and type. Atmospheric sources of PAHs in the UK are probably not dominated by any single clear and strong source type, so the mixture of PAHs in air is quickly "blended" away from the influence of the few major point sources which exist and further weathered in the environment by atmospheric reactions and selective loss processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21859122     DOI: 10.1021/es202277u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  30 in total

1.  Combustion-Related Organic Species in Temporally Resolved Urban Airborne Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Mary M Lynam; J Timothy Dvonch; John M Turlington; David Olson; Matthew S Landis
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Risk assessment of PBDEs and PAHs in house dust in Kocaeli, Turkey: levels and sources.

Authors:  Mihriban Yılmaz Civan; U Merve Kara
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Effect of activated carbon and biochars on the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different industrially contaminated soils.

Authors:  Michał Kołtowski; Isabel Hilber; Thomas D Bucheli; Patryk Oleszczuk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals in mosque's carpet dust of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and their health risk implications.

Authors:  Aarif H El-Mubarak; Ahmed I Rushdi; Khalid F Al-Mutlaq; Falah Z Al Mdawi; Khalid Al-Hazmi; Ramil S Dumenden; Rex A Pascua
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Profiles, sources, and transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils affected by electronic waste recycling in Longtang, south China.

Authors:  De-Yin Huang; Chuan-Ping Liu; Fang-Bai Li; Tong-Xu Liu; Cheng-Shuai Liu; Liang Tao; Yan Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soil of Novi Sad, Serbia: occurrence and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Biljana D Škrbić; Nataša Đurišić-Mladenović; Đorđe J Tadić; Jelena Đ Cvejanov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Potential sources and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in street dusts of Karaj urban area, northern Iran.

Authors:  Afshin Qishlaqi; Fahimeh Beiramali
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2019-12-11

8.  Carcinogenic and endocrine-disrupting PAHs in the aquatic ecosystem of India.

Authors:  Pravin U Singare
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Residential heating contribution to level of air pollutants (PAHs, major, trace, and rare earth elements): a moss bag case study.

Authors:  Gordana Vuković; Mira Aničić Urošević; Miodrag Pergal; Milan Janković; Zoya Goryainova; Milica Tomašević; Aleksandar Popović
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Estimating population exposure to ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in the United States - Part II: Source apportionment and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Peng Wang; Jingyi Li; Pauline Mendola; Seth Sherman; Qi Ying
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.