Literature DB >> 21631199

The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy.

Emily B Ridgway1, John Berry-Candelario, Ronald T Grondin, Gary F Rogers, Mark R Proctor.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Suturectomy as a treatment for craniosynostosis was largely replaced in the late twentieth century by more extensive, but predictable, cranial remodeling procedures. Recent technical innovations, such as using the endoscope combined with postoperative orthotic reshaping, have led to a resurgence of interest in suturectomy as a safer, less invasive method.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all cases of sagittal synostosis treated with endoscopic sagittal suture strip craniectomy and helmet therapy between 2004 and 2008. Data collected included gestational age, genetic evaluations and syndromic status, age at operation, duration of procedure, need for blood transfusions, length of hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative head circumference percentile and cranial index, duration of helmet use, length of follow-up, complications, and revisions.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with isolated sagittal synostosis were treated using endoscopic suturectomy and completed helmet therapy. Mean age at time of procedure was 3.24 months. Mean operative duration was 45.32 minutes. Mean hospital stay was 1.39 days. There were 2 transfusions and no deaths. The mean length of follow-up was 2.34 years. Helmet therapy was instituted for a mean of 7.47 months. Head circumference percentile increased from 61.42% to 89.27% over 2 years of follow-up. Cranial index increased from a preoperative mean of 0.69 to 0.76 over 2 years of follow-up. Reoperations for synostosis included 1 sagittal suture refusion and 2 cases in which other sutures fused.
CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal synostosis can be safely treated with endoscopic suturectomy and helmet therapy. Improvements in cranial volume and shape are comparable to open procedures and are enduring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21631199     DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.PEDS10418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  17 in total

1.  Effects of open and endoscopic surgery on skull growth and calvarial vault volumes in sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Rahel G Ghenbot; Kamlesh B Patel; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Matthew D Smyth; Albert S Woo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Single incision endoscope-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Rafael Uribe-Cardenas; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Andrew W Hoey; Benjamin S Carson; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-03-10

4.  The utility and post-operative evolution of head circumference in nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis: a prospective study in Vietnamese children.

Authors:  Dang Do Thanh Can; Jacob R Lepard; Pham Ngoc Thach; Pham Anh Tuan; James M Johnston; John H Grant
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.532

Review 5.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Geoffrey E Hespe; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Results of early surgery for sagittal suture synostosis: long-term follow-up and the occurrence of raised intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Marie-Lise C van Veelen; Oscar H J Eelkman Rooda; Tim de Jong; Ruben Dammers; Leon N A van Adrichem; Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Endoscope-assisted management of sagittal synostosis: wide vertex suturectomy and barrel stave osteotomies versus narrow vertex suturectomy.

Authors:  Brian J Dlouhy; Dennis C Nguyen; Kamlesh B Patel; Gwendolyn M Hoben; Gary B Skolnick; Sybill D Naidoo; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Microscopic versus open approach to craniosynostosis: a long-term outcomes comparison.

Authors:  John F Teichgraeber; James E Baumgartner; Stephen L Viviano; Jaime Gateno; James J Xia
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 9.  Endoscopic craniosynostosis repair.

Authors:  Mark R Proctor
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2014-07

10.  Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution.

Authors:  Rowland H Han; Dennis C Nguyen; Brent S Bruck; Gary B Skolnick; Chester K Yarbrough; Sybill D Naidoo; Kamlesh B Patel; Alex A Kane; Albert S Woo; Matthew D Smyth
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.