Alistair J Sharples1, Chandra V N Cheruvu2. 1. University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke on Trent, ST4 6QG, Staffordshire, UK. alsharples@yahoo.co.uk. 2. University Hospitals of North Midlands, Newcastle Road, Stoke on Trent, ST4 6QG, Staffordshire, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been linked with reduced productivity in the workplace and is associated with higher levels of unemployment and absenteeism. Studies have shown improvement in functioning and enhanced activity levels in patients after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on occupational outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and NHS Evidence were searched for English language studies assessing factors related to employment both preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The initial search produced 189 results. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Meta-analysis did not suggest a significant improvement in overall employment rates after surgery (RR 1.058, p = 0.155). However, pooled analysis of studies analysing unemployed patients separately demonstrates that 26.4 % (95 % CI 21.6-31.5 %) of unemployed patients are able to return to work after bariatric surgery. Pooled analysis on two studies suggests that those undergoing surgery are 3.24 (p = 0.01) times more likely to return to work than non-surgical controls. Three studies demonstrated significant reductions in the mean number of annual sick days. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence in the literature regarding occupational outcomes following bariatric surgery, and further studies are required before firm conclusions can be drawn. However, the existing evidence does suggest that bariatric surgery has a generally positive impact on occupational outcomes. This suggests that surgery may have wider economic, social and psychological benefits above and beyond its immediate health benefits.
INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been linked with reduced productivity in the workplace and is associated with higher levels of unemployment and absenteeism. Studies have shown improvement in functioning and enhanced activity levels in patients after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on occupational outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and NHS Evidence were searched for English language studies assessing factors related to employment both preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: The initial search produced 189 results. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Meta-analysis did not suggest a significant improvement in overall employment rates after surgery (RR 1.058, p = 0.155). However, pooled analysis of studies analysing unemployed patients separately demonstrates that 26.4 % (95 % CI 21.6-31.5 %) of unemployed patients are able to return to work after bariatric surgery. Pooled analysis on two studies suggests that those undergoing surgery are 3.24 (p = 0.01) times more likely to return to work than non-surgical controls. Three studies demonstrated significant reductions in the mean number of annual sick days. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence in the literature regarding occupational outcomes following bariatric surgery, and further studies are required before firm conclusions can be drawn. However, the existing evidence does suggest that bariatric surgery has a generally positive impact on occupational outcomes. This suggests that surgery may have wider economic, social and psychological benefits above and beyond its immediate health benefits.
Entities:
Keywords:
Absenteeism; Occupational outcomes; Quality of life
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Torgeir T Søvik; Erlend T Aasheim; Osama Taha; My Engström; Morten W Fagerland; Sofia Björkman; Jon Kristinsson; Kare I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Maja Bramming; Ulrik Becker; Maja B Jørgensen; Søren Neermark; Thue Bisgaard; Janne S Tolstrup Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Agnès Leclercq; Bart Van der Schueren; Amber Van den Eynde; Diederik De Cock; Valérie Fabri; Wies Kestens; Tonio Di Zinno; Steven Brabant; Ann Mertens; Roman Vangoitsenhoven; Ellen Deleus; Matthias Lannoo; Ronny Bruffaerts Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 3.479
Authors: Michael J Courtney; K Mahawar; P Burnell; N Jennings; S Balupuri; N Schroeder; P Small; W Carr Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Mary Lucy Marques; Alessia Alunno; Sofia Ramiro; Polina Putrik; Annelies Boonen; Marieke M Ter Wee; Louise Falzon Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-02
Authors: Marleen M Romeijn; Marlies Bongers; Daniëlle D B Holthuijsen; Loes Janssen; François M H van Dielen; Han J R Anema; Wouter K G Leclercq Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Piotr Major; Tomasz Stefura; Błażej Dziurowicz; Joanna Radwan; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Małczak; Michał Pędziwiatr Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 4.129