Literature DB >> 27604762

Comparisons of focal macular electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Shigeki Machida1,2, Tomoharu Nishimura3, Takayuki Ohzeki4, Ken-Ichi Murai4, Daijiro Kurosaka4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of indocyanine green (ICG)-, brilliant blue G (BBG)-, or triamcinolone acetonide (TA)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during macular hole (MH) surgery on the different components of the focal macular electroretinograms (fmERGs).
METHODS: Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients with a macular hole were randomly divided into those undergoing ICG-, BBG-, or TA-assisted vitrectomy (n = 16 for each group). All patients had combined cataract and macular hole surgery with ILM peeling. The fmERGs were recorded before, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The amplitudes and implicit times of the a- and b-waves, the amplitudes of the sum of the oscillatory potentials (ΣOPs), and the photopic negative responses (PhNRs) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The amplitudes of all of the components of the fmERGs gradually increased with time after surgery (P < 0.005). The implicit times of the a- and b-waves were significantly prolonged at 1 month (P < 0.01) and then gradually returned to the baseline times. No significant differences were found in these changes among the groups. In pooled data from the 48 patients, the PhNR amplitude increased more than the a- and b-waves and the ΣOPs amplitudes at every time point after 3 months (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of significant differences on the different components of the fmERGs indicates that none of the three agents was toxic to the macula. After closure of a MH, the function of the retinal ganglion cells may recover more than that of the other neural elements in the macular area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BBG; Focal macular ERG; ICG; Macular hole; Photopic negative response; Retinal ganglion cell; Triamcinolone acetonide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604762     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3478-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  32 in total

1.  Electrophysiological studies of binocular stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  K MOTOKAWA; D NAKAGAWA; T KOHATA
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-08

Review 2.  [Studies of local macular ERG].

Authors:  Y Miyake
Journal:  Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1988-09

3.  Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Noemi Lois; Jennifer Burr; John Norrie; Luke Vale; Jonathan Cook; Alison McDonald; Charles Boachie; Laura Ternent; Gladys McPherson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Observation of the ocular fundus by an infrared-sensitive video camera after vitreoretinal surgery assisted by indocyanine green.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Takamitsu Fujiwara; Toshihiro Gotoh; Yutaka Hasegawa; Akiko Gotoh; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparative in vitro safety analysis of dyes for chromovitrectomy: indocyanine green, brilliant blue green, bromophenol blue, and infracyanine green.

Authors:  Sankarathi Balaiya; Vikram S Brar; Ravi K Murthy; Kakarla V Chalam
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Visual field defects after uneventful vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane with indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Akinori Uemura; Shigeru Kanda; Yushi Sakamoto; Hazuki Kita
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Long-term outcomes of macular hole surgery with triamcinolone acetonide-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Kumagai; Mariko Furukawa; Nobuchika Ogino; Eric Larson; Akinori Uemura
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Macular hole surgery with triamcinolone acetonide-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling: one-year results.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nomoto; Fumio Shiraga; Hidetaka Yamaji; Koki Fukuda; Tetsuya Baba; Ippei Takasu; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Effects of indocyanine green on retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Aya Iriyama; Saiko Uchida; Yasuo Yanagi; Yasuhiro Tamaki; Yuji Inoue; Kyosuke Matsuura; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of trypan blue and Brilliant Blue G for staining of the anterior lens capsule during cataract surgery: short-term results.

Authors:  Takamitsu Nagashima; Kentaro Yuda; Takahiko Hayashi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  OCT angiography in idiopathic macular holes, some methodological concerns.

Authors:  Joel Hanhart
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Internal limiting membrane peeling with different dyes in the surgery of idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review of literature and network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Ran You; Min Li; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  M Y Faria; D C Sousa; S Mano; R Marques; N P Ferreira; A Fonseca
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Preoperative prognostic factors for macular hole surgery: Which is better?

Authors:  Erkan Unsal; Mehmet Ozgur Cubuk; Furkan Ciftci
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

7.  Long-Term Observations of Thickness Changes of Each Retinal Layer following Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  Atsushi Tada; Shigeki Machida; Yuji Hara; Satoshi Ebihara; Masahiko Ishizuka; Mana Gonmori
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.