Literature DB >> 23179172

NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy.

K L Wilson1, J L Czerwinski, J M Hoskovec, S J Noblin, C M Sullivan, A Harbison, M W Campion, K Devary, P Devers, C N Singletary.   

Abstract

The BUN and FASTER studies, two prospective multicenter trials in the United States, validated the accuracy and detection rates of first and second trimester screening previously reported abroad. These studies, coupled with the 2007 release of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin that endorsed first trimester screening as an alternative to traditional second trimester multiple marker screening, led to an explosion of screening options available to pregnant women. ACOG also recommended that invasive diagnostic testing for chromosome aneuploidy be made available to all women regardless of maternal age. More recently, another option known as Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) became available to screen for chromosome aneuploidy. While screening and testing options may be limited due to a variety of factors, healthcare providers need to be aware of the options in their area in order to provide their patients with accurate and reliable information. If not presented clearly, patients may feel overwhelmed at the number of choices available. The following guideline includes recommendations for healthcare providers regarding which screening or diagnostic test should be offered based on availability, insurance coverage, and timing of a patient's entry into prenatal care, as well as a triage assessment so that a general process can be adapted to unique situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179172     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9545-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  43 in total

1.  Is there a nuchal translucency millimeter measurement above which there is no added benefit from first trimester serum screening?

Authors:  Christine H Comstock; Fergal D Malone; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; George R Saade; Richard L Berkowitz; Jose Ferreira; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Diana W Bianchi; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Comparing three screening strategies for combining first- and second-trimester Down syndrome markers.

Authors:  Glenn E Palomaki; Klaus Steinort; George J Knight; James E Haddow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group.

Authors:  L G Jackson; J M Zachary; S E Fowler; R J Desnick; M S Golbus; D H Ledbetter; M J Mahoney; E Pergament; J L Simpson; S Black
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Increased nuchal translucency in euploid fetuses--what should we be telling the parents?

Authors:  C M Bilardo; E Timmerman; E Pajkrt; M van Maarle
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  Multicentre randomised clinical trial of chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis. First report. Canadian Collaborative CVS-Amniocentesis Clinical Trial Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomised study of risk of fetal loss related to early amniocentesis versus chorionic villus sampling.

Authors:  K Sundberg; J Bang; S Smidt-Jensen; V Brocks; C Lundsteen; J Parner; N Keiding; J Philip
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Sonographic markers of fetal trisomies: second trimester.

Authors:  D A Nyberg; V L Souter
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Expanding multiple marker screening for Down's syndrome to include Edward's syndrome.

Authors:  G Barkai; B Goldman; L Ries; R Chaki; T Zer; H Cuckle
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Sequential pathways of testing after first-trimester screening for trisomy 21.

Authors:  Lawrence D Platt; Naomi Greene; Anthony Johnson; Julia Zachary; Elizabeth Thom; David Krantz; Joe Leigh Simpson; Richard K Silver; Rosalinde J M Snijders; Laura Goetzl; Eugene Pergament; Karen Filkins; Maurice J Mahoney; W Allen Hogge; R Douglas Wilson; Patrick Mohide; Douglas Hershey; Scott MacGregor; Ray Bahado-Singh; Laird G Jackson; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: recommendations for prenatal counseling. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  1995-07-21
View more
  26 in total

1.  Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A2: a novel biomarker for Down syndrome.

Authors:  S Munnangi; S J Gross; R Madankumar; G Salcedo; S E Reznik
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Quantitative MRI Analyses of Regional Brain Growth in Living Fetuses with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Tomo Tarui; Kiho Im; Neel Madan; Rajeevi Madankumar; Brian G Skotko; Allie Schwartz; Christianne Sharr; Steven J Ralston; Rie Kitano; Shizuko Akiyama; Hyuk Jin Yun; Ellen Grant; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Nationwide survey for current clinical status of amniocentesis and maternal serum marker test in Japan.

Authors:  Hidehiko Miyake; Shigehito Yamada; Yosuke Fujii; Hideaki Sawai; Naoko Arimori; Yasuko Yamanouchi; Yuka Ozasa; Makoto Kanai; Haruhiko Sago; Akihiko Sekizawa; Fumio Takada; Hideaki Masuzaki; Yoichi Matsubara; Fumiki Hirahara; Koji Kugu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  A survey on awareness of genetic counseling for non-invasive prenatal testing: the first year experience in Japan.

Authors:  Junko Yotsumoto; Akihiko Sekizawa; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Takahiro Yamada; Osamu Samura; Miyuki Nishiyama; Kiyonori Miura; Hideaki Sawai; Jun Murotsuki; Michihiro Kitagawa; Yoshimasa Kamei; Hideaki Masuzaki; Fumiki Hirahara; Toshiaki Endo; Akimune Fukushima; Akira Namba; Hisao Osada; Yasuyo Kasai; Atsushi Watanabe; Yukiko Katagiri; Naoki Takeshita; Masaki Ogawa; Takashi Okai; Shunichiro Izumi; Haruka Hamanoue; Mayuko Inuzuka; Kazufumi Haino; Naoki Hamajima; Haruki Nishizawa; Yoko Okamoto; Hiroaki Nakamura; Takeshi Kanegawa; Jun Yoshimatsu; Shinya Tairaku; Katsuhiko Naruse; Hisashi Masuyama; Maki Hyodo; Takashi Kaji; Kazuhisa Maeda; Keiichi Matsubara; Masanobu Ogawa; Toshiyuki Yoshizato; Takashi Ohba; Yukie Kawano; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Kendall L Umstead; Jennifer J Johnston; Erin Turbitt; Kristen P Fishler; John H Patton; Ilana M Miller; Alexis R Heidlebaugh; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Managing Couple Conflict During Prenatal Counseling Sessions: An Investigation of Genetic Counselor Experiences and Perceptions.

Authors:  Kara Schoeffel; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Karol Rubin; Bonnie LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.