Literature DB >> 27604366

Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience.

Vamsi V Alli1, Jie Yang2, Jianjin Xu3, Andrew T Bates4, Aurora D Pryor4, Mark A Talamini4, Dana A Telem5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), there has been continued evolution in technique, instrumentation and postoperative management. With increased experience, LC has migrated to the outpatient setting. We asked whether increased availability and experience has impacted incidence of and indications for LC.
METHODS: The New York (NY) State Planning and Research Cooperative System longitudinal administrative database was utilized to identify patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 1995 and 2013. ICD-9 and CPT procedure codes were extracted corresponding to laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy and the associated primary diagnostic codes. Data were analyzed as relative change in incidence (normalized to 1000 LC patients) for respective diagnoses.
RESULTS: From 1995 to 2013, 711,406 cholecystectomies were performed in NY State: 637,308 (89.58 %) laparoscopic. The overall frequency of cholecystectomy did not increase (1.23 % increase with a commensurate population increase of 6.32 %). Indications for LC during this time were: 72.81 % for calculous cholecystitis (n = 464,032), 4.88 % for biliary colic (n = 31,124), 8.98 % for acalculous cholecystitis (n = 57,205), 3.01 % for gallstone pancreatitis (n = 19,193), and 1.59 % for biliary dyskinesia (n = 10,110). The incidence of calculous cholecystitis declined (-20.09 %, p < 0.0001) between 1995 and 2013; meanwhile, other diagnoses increased in incidence: biliary colic (+54.96 %, p = 0.0013), acalculous cholecystitis (+94.24 %, p < 0.0001), gallstone pancreatitis (+107.48 %, p < 0.0001), and biliary dyskinesia (+331.74 %, p < 0.0001). Outpatient LC incidence catapulted to 48.59 % in 2013, from 0.15 % in 1995, increasing >320-fold. Analysis of LC through 2014 revealed increasing rates of digestive, infectious, respiratory, and renal complications, with overall cholecystectomy complication rates of 9.29 %.
CONCLUSION: A shifting distribution of operative indications and increasing rates of complications should prompt careful consideration prior to surgery for benign biliary disease. For what is a common procedure, LC carries substantial risk of complications, thus requiring the patient to be an active participant and to share in the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary colic; Biliary dyskinesia; Cholecystitis; Gallstone pancreatitis; Indications; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27604366     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5154-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Sincalide cholescintigraphy--32 years later: evidence-based data on its clinical utility and infusion methodology.

Authors:  Harvey A Ziessman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  In response to: Preston JF, Diggs BS, Dolan JP, Gilbert EW, Schein M, Hunter JG. Biliary dyskinesia: a surgical disease rarely found outside the United States. Am J Surg. 2015;209:799-803.

Authors:  Cornelius A Thiels; Robert R Cima; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Management of gallbladder dyskinesia: patient outcomes following positive ⁹⁹mtechnetium (Tc)-labelled hepatic iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scintigraphy with cholecystokinin (CCK) provocation and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R V Dave; S Pathak; A J Cockbain; J P Lodge; A M Smith; F U Chowdhury; G J Toogood
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Surgical therapy for biliary dyskinesia: a meta-analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky; Robert DeSagun; Fredrick Brody
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Rome IV. Gallbladder and Sphincter of Oddi Disorders.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G H Elta; C R Carter; P J Pasricha; E S Corazziari
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  NIH Consensus conference. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-02-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  C A Steiner; E B Bass; M A Talamini; H A Pitt; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Acalculous biliary pain: new concepts for an old entity.

Authors:  E Shaffer
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 9.  Cholecystectomy for suspected gallbladder dyskinesia.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Sameer Junnarkar; Marwan Farouk; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

10.  Increased rate of cholecystectomies performed with doubtful or no indications after laparoscopy introduction: a single center experience.

Authors:  Elia Pulvirenti; Adriana Toro; Michel Gagner; Maurizio Mannino; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  8 in total

1.  Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement.

Authors:  Meredith Barrett; Horacio J Asbun; Hung-Lung Chien; L Michael Brunt; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Spyridon Pagkratis; Eugene Boilesen; Tiffany Tanner; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  What happens to biliary colic patients in New York State? 10-year follow-up from emergency department visits.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Chencan Zhu; Samer Sbayi; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Mark Talamini; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A Simple Risk Score to Predict Clavien-Dindo Grade IV and V Complications After Non-elective Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jonathan Burke; Rishi Rattan; Shaina Sedighim; Minjae Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  To drain or not to drain: the association between residual intraperitoneal gas and post-laparoscopic shoulder pain for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shun-Chin Yang; Kuang-Yi Chang; Ling-Fang Wei; Yi-Ming Shyr; Chiu-Ming Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Unexpectedly High Prevalence of Cystoisospora belli Infection in Acalculous Gallbladders of Immunocompetent Patients.

Authors:  Mushal Noor; Philip J Katzman; Aaron R Huber; Jennifer J Findeis-Hosey; Christa Whitney-Miller; Raul S Gonzalez; Zhongren Zhou; Henriette D N'kodia; Kathryn Skonick; Rebecca L Abell; Lawrence J Saubermann; Laura W Lamps; Michael G Drage
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Increases in cholecystectomy for gallstone related disease in South Africa.

Authors:  Zafar Ahmed Khan; Muhammed Uzayr Khan; Martin Brand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.