Literature DB >> 29063306

What happens to biliary colic patients in New York State? 10-year follow-up from emergency department visits.

Maria S Altieri1,2, Jie Yang3, Chencan Zhu4, Samer Sbayi5, Konstantinos Spaniolas5, Mark Talamini5, Aurora Pryor5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Biliary colic is a common diagnosis for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to examine the outcomes of patients coming to the ED with biliary colic.
METHODS: The NYS longitudinal SPARCS database was used to identify patients presenting to the ED with biliary colic from 2005 to 2014. Through the use of a unique identifier, patients were followed in NYS across multiple institutions. Patients who were lost to follow-up, with duplicated records, and those that underwent percutaneous cholecystectomy tubes were excluded from the analysis.
RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2014, there were 72,376 patients who presented to an ED with biliary colic. The admission rate was 20.7-26.02%. Overall, most patients who presented to the ED did not undergo surgery (39,567, 54.7%), of which 35,204 (89%) had only one ED visit, while 4,363(11%) returned to the ED (≥ 2 visits). Only 3.23-5.51% of patients underwent cholecystectomy at the time of initial presentation. Most subsequent cholecystectomies were performed electively (27.38-52.51%) (See Table 1 in this article). Average time to surgery among patients with elective cholecystectomy was 178.4 days. From the patients who underwent cholecystectomy, 10.35% had cholecystectomy at their first ED visit, 77.7% had cholecystectomy following the first ED visit, and 12% had multiple ED visits prior to surgery. Among patients who were discharged from the ED, 32% had their surgery at a different hospital than index presentation.
CONCLUSION: A significant portion of patients (48.6%) who present to the ED with biliary colic will not return or have surgery within 5 years. A third of patients who eventually undergo cholecystectomy will go to another hospital for their surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary colic; Diagnosis; ED

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29063306     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5902-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications of prolonged waiting times for surgery.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Peter M Hewitt; Michael G Pritchard
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Understanding the statistics and limitations of large database analyses.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience.

Authors:  Vamsi V Alli; Jie Yang; Jianjin Xu; Andrew T Bates; Aurora D Pryor; Mark A Talamini; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Appropriateness variation in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  José M Quintana; José Cabriada; Ignacio López de Tejada; Luis Perdigo; Inmaculada Aróstegui; Amaia Bilbao; Idoia Garay
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  PREOP-Gallstones: A Prognostic Nomogram for the Management of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis in Older Patients.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Deepak Adhikari; Robert A Davee; Gabriela M Vargas; Nina P Tamirisa; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Symptomatic, non-complicated gallbladder stone disease. Operation or observation? A randomized clinical study.

Authors:  M Vetrhus; O Søreide; J H Solhaug; I Nesvik; K Søndenaa
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Hospital volume and patient outcomes after cholecystectomy in Scotland: retrospective, national population based study.

Authors:  Ewen M Harrison; Stephen O'Neill; Thomas S Meurs; Pang L Wong; Mark Duxbury; Simon Paterson-Brown; Stephen J Wigmore; O James Garden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-23

Review 9.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rahul Koti; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 10.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Miriam Brazzelli; Moira Cruickshank; Mary Kilonzo; Irfan Ahmed; Fiona Stewart; Paul McNamee; Andrew Elders; Cynthia Fraser; Alison Avenell; Craig Ramsay
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  2 in total

1.  Administrative codes may have limited utility in diagnosing biliary colic in emergency department visits: A validation study.

Authors:  Jordan Nantais; Muhammad Mansour; Charles de Mestral; Shiva Jayaraman; David Gomez
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2022-07-19

2.  Patterns of care after cholecystostomy tube placement.

Authors:  Alex Lois; Erin Fennern; Sara Cook; David Flum; Giana Davidson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.