| Literature DB >> 27604263 |
Poonam Phalak1, Jin Chen1, Ross P Carlson2, Michael A Henson3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds are often colonized by consortia comprised of different bacterial species growing as biofilms on a complex mixture of wound exudate. Bacteria growing in biofilms exhibit phenotypes distinct from planktonic growth, often rendering the application of antibacterial compounds ineffective. Computational modeling represents a complementary tool to experimentation for generating fundamental knowledge and developing more effective treatment strategies for chronic wound biofilm consortia.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilms; Metabolic modeling; Wound infections
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27604263 PMCID: PMC5015247 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-016-0334-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Fig. 1Formulation and solution of the multispecies biofilm metabolic model. a Schematic representation of the chronic wound biofilm model of constant thickness W with glucose provided at the tissue-biofilm interface (z = 0), oxygen supplied at the biofilm-air interface (z = W) and the metabolic byproducts acetate, succinate and lactate removed at the tissue-biofilm interface. b Schematic representation of the biofilm metabolic model solution procedure. The multispecies biofilm with temporal and spatial variations is described by a spatiotemporal model that accounts for the diffusion of nutrients and byproducts. PDEs are written with respect to the bacterial species concentration (X i) and the metabolite concentrations (M j) assuming that spatial variations are limited to a single direction z. Lexicographic linear program solution of the genome-scale reconstruction of each species is performed to predict the growth rate, nutrient uptake rates and byproduct secretion rates. The PDEs are spatially discretized to yield a large-set of ODEs with embedded LPs that are integrated with the MATLAB code DFBAlab [78] to generate time and spatially resolved predictions
Nominal nutrient uptake parameters
| Nutrient |
| |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Glucose | 10 | 0.5 |
| Oxygen | 20 | 0.003 |
| Succinate | 10 | 0.5 |
| Lactate | 10 | 0.5 |
| Acetate | 10 | 0.5 |
Nominal model parameter values
| Parameter | Description | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Biofilm thickness | 80 μm | Specified |
|
| Bulk glucose concentration | 7.5 mmol/L | [ |
|
| Oxygen concentration at the biofilm-air interface | 0.21 mmol/L | [ |
|
| Oxygen concentration at the tissue-biofilm interface | 0 mmol/L | Specified |
|
| Bulk acetate concentration | 0 mmol/L | Specified |
|
| Bulk succinate concentration | 0 mmol/L | Specified |
|
| Bulk lactate concentration | 1.0 mmol/L | [ |
|
| Bulk pyocyanin concentration | 0 mmol/L | Specified |
|
| Death rate constants | 0–0.01 h−1 | Calculated |
|
| Pyocyanin-associated death rate constant | 0.4 mmol/gDW/h | Specified |
|
| Pyocyanin flux bound | 0.1 L/mmol/h | Specified |
|
| Maximum biomass concentration | 200 g/L | [ |
|
| Mass transfer coefficients for glucose, acetate, succinate, lactate and pyocyanin | 2.0 × 10−4 cm/s | Specified |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for glucose | 9.4 × 10−6 cm2/s | [ |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for oxygen | 26.8 × 10−6 cm2/s | [ |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for acetate | 16.2 × 10−6 cm2/s | [ |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for succinate | 12.6 × 10−6 cm2/s | [ |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for lactate | 12.1 × 10−6 cm2/s | [ |
|
| Aqueous diffusion coefficient for pyocyanin | 7.2 × 10−6 cm2/s | Specified |
|
| Adjustable parameter for glucose, succinate, lactate and pyocyanin in Eq. ( | 0.33 | Fitted |
|
| Adjustable parameter for oxygen in Eq. ( | 0.19 | Fitted |
|
| Adjustable parameter for acetate in Eq. ( | 0.36 | Fitted |
|
| Initial biomass concentrations | 1 g/L | Specified |
|
| Aerotaxis rate constant | 5 × 10−8 cm2. L/mmol. s | Specified |
|
| Oxygen mass transfer coefficient | 2.0 × 10−2 cm/s | Specified |
Lexicographic objective functions
| Number | Species | Direction | Objective | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PA | Maximize | Growth rate | Assumed primary objective |
| SA | Growth rate | |||
| 2 | PA | Minimize | Acetate secretion flux | Minimize byproduct synthesis |
| SA | Acetate secretion flux | |||
| 3 | PA | Minimize | Succinate secretion flux | Minimize byproduct synthesis |
| SA | Lactate secretion flux | |||
| 4 | PA | Maximize | Glucose uptake flux | Maximize nutrient consumption |
| SA | ||||
| 5 | PA | Maximize | Oxygen uptake flux | Maximize nutrient consumption |
| SA | ||||
| 6 | PA | Maximize | Lactate uptake flux | Maximize consumption of putative cross-fed metabolite |
| SA | Succinate uptake flux |
Flux balance analysis of P. aeruginosa (PA) and S. aureus (SA) single species metabolism. Growth rates (h−1) are shown for different combinations of substrate uptake rates (mmol/gDW/h)
Representative uptake rates at the top, middle and bottom of a typical simulated two species biofilm are colored coded
Fig. 2Spatially resolved predictions for single species biofilms. a P. aeruginosa with a maximum biofilm of thickness W = 30 μm. b S. aureus with a maximum biofilm of thickness W = 90 μm
Fig. 3Predictions for a two species biofilm of thickness W = 80 μm (Base case scenario). a Time resolved predictions over the first 50 h at the bottom, middle and top of the biofilm. b Spatially resolved biomass and metabolite concentration predictions after 1000 h. c Spatially resolved effective growth and uptake rate predictions after 10 h
Fig. 4Predictions after 1000 h for two species biofilms of thickness W = 80 μm with different species interaction mechanisms. Base case (BC): competition for the nutrients glucose and oxygen. Cross-feed (C-f): nutrient competition plus cross feeding of lactate, succinate and acetate. Lysis (Ly): nutrient competition plus P. aeruginosa mediated lysis of S. aureus. Aerotaxis (AT): nutrient competition plus P. aeruginosa chemotaxis towards oxygen. a-d Spatially resolved biomass concentrations and e P. aeruginosa (PA), S. aureus (SA), total biomass concentrations averaged across the biofilm and maximum thickness for the eight considered scenarios
Fig. 5Spatially resolved predictions after 1000 h for a two species biofilm of thickness W = 80 μm with pyocyanin mediated lysis of S. aureus. a Biomass and metabolite concentration predictions after 1000 h. b Effective growth and uptake rate predictions after 10 h
Fig. 6Spatially resolved predictions after 1000 h for a two species biofilm of thickness W = 80 µm with P. aeruginosa aerotaxis. a Biomass and metabolite concentration predictions after 1000 h. b Effective growth and uptake rate predictions after 10 h