| Literature DB >> 29282051 |
Michael A Henson1, Poonam Phalak2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), which include ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, cause chronic inflammation of the digestive tract in approximately 1.6 million Americans. A signature of IBD is dysbiosis of the gut microbiota marked by a significant reduction of obligate anaerobes and a sharp increase in facultative anaerobes. Numerous experimental studies have shown that IBD is strongly correlated with a decrease of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and an increase of Escherichia coli. One hypothesis is that chronic inflammation induces increased oxygen levels in the gut, which in turn causes an imbalance between obligate and facultative anaerobes.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilms; Gut microbiota; Inflammatory bowel disease; Metabolic modeling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29282051 PMCID: PMC5745886 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0522-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the in silico gut community. a The model captured biofilm attachment to the intestinal wall, and diffusion of carbohydrates, amino acids, oxygen, short-chain fatty acids, organic acids and species biomass into and/or out of the biofilm. b Modeled cross feeding of byproducts between the three species
Nominal parameter values for the multispecies biofilm model
| Symbol | Parameter | Value | Units | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Biofilm thickness | 40 |
| [ |
|
| Biomass diffusion coefficients | 1x10 −10 | cm2/s | [ |
|
| Biomass mass transfer coefficients | 1x10 −7 | cm/s | [ |
|
| Biomass bulk concentrations | 0 | g/L | [ |
|
| Carbohydrate diffusion coefficients | 2x10 −6 | cm2/s | [ |
| Amino acid diffusion coefficients | 2x10 −6 | cm2/s | [ | |
| Oxygen diffusion coefficient | 8x10 −6 | cm2/s | [ | |
|
| Nutrient mass transfer coefficients | 2x10 −4 | cm/s | [ |
| Amino acid mass transfer coefficients | 2x10 −4 | cm/s | [ | |
| Oxygen mass transfer coefficient | 2x10 −2 | cm/s | Specified | |
|
| Oxygen bulk concentration | 0 | mM | Specified |
|
| Byproduct diffusion coefficients | 2x10 −6 | cm2/s | [ |
|
| Byproduct mass transfer coefficients | 5x10 −6 | cm/s | [ |
| Butyrate mass transfer coefficient | 5x10 −5 | cm/s | Tuned | |
| Propionate mass transfer coefficient | 1x10 −5 | cm/s | Tuned | |
|
| Byproduct bulk concentrations | 0 | mM | [ |
|
| Carbohydrate maximum uptake rates | 10 | mmol/gDW/h | [ |
| Amino acid maximum uptake rates | 1 | mmol/gDW/h | [ | |
| Oxygen maximum uptake rate | 20 | mmol/gDW/h | [ | |
| Byproduct maximum uptake rates | 10 | mmol/gDW/h | [ | |
|
| Carbohydrate Michaelis-Menten constants | 0.5 | mM | [ |
| Amino acids Michaelis-Menten constants | 0.1 | mM | [ | |
| Oxygen Michaelis-Menten constant | 0.003 | mM | [ | |
| Byproduct Michaelis-Menten constants | 0.5 | mM | [ | |
|
|
| 8.43 | mmol/gDW/h | [ |
|
| 4.75 | mmol/gDW/h | Tuned | |
|
| 5.5 | mmol/gDW/h | Tuned |
Bulk carbohydrate and amino acid concentrations representing a high carbohydrate diet
| Nutrient | C6 Concentration | Carbons | Actual concentration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arabinose | 1.000 | 5 | 1.200 |
| Fructose | 1.000 | 6 | 1.000 |
| Galactose | 1.000 | 6 | 1.000 |
| Glucose | 2.000 | 6 | 2.000 |
| Total CHO | 5.000 | – | 5.200 |
| Cysteine | 0.150 | 3 | 0.300 |
| Isoleucine | 0.150 | 6 | 0.150 |
| Leucine | 0.150 | 6 | 0.150 |
| Lysine | 0.150 | 6 | 0.150 |
| Methionine | 0.150 | 5 | 0.180 |
| Proline | 0.150 | 5 | 0.180 |
| Serine | 0.150 | 3 | 0.300 |
| Threonine | 0.150 | 4 | 0.225 |
| Tryptophan | 0.150 | 11 | 0.082 |
| Valine | 0.150 | 5 | 0.180 |
| Total AA | 1.500 | – | 1.897 |
Fig. 2Effect of oxygen on the time evolution of the biofilm community. The bulk oxygen concentration was set at 3x10 −3 mM. a–c Abundances of B. thetaiotaomicron, F. prausnitzii and E. coli at the top, middle and bottom of the biofilm. d SCFA levels averaged across the biofilm where the symbols represent the initial values. e Byproduct concentrations averaged across the biofilm. f Spatial profile of the steady-state oxygen concentration
Fig. 3Effect of different oxygen concentrations on the steady-state behavior of the biofilm community. The bulk oxygen concentration was set to a fixed value between 0 and 5x10 −3 mM for each simulation. a Species abundances (%) averaged across the biofilm for the range of bulk oxygen concentrations. b Species O2 uptake rates (mmol/gDW/h) for three bulk oxygen concentrations. c-e Growth rates (h −1) of B. thetaiotaomicron, F. prausnitzii and E. coli relative to their anaerobic values for three bulk oxygen concentrations. f–h Uptake rates (mmol/gDW/h) of cross-fed byproducts relative to their anaerobic values for three bulk oxygen concentrations
Fig. 4Combined effects of different diets and oxygen concentrations on the steady-state abundances of the three species. Bulk carbohydrate and amino acid concentrations were varied according to the diet and the bulk oxygen concentration was set to a fixed value between 0 and 5x10 −3 mM. a Anaerobic species abundances averaged across the biofilm. b Spatial profiles of the steady-state oxygen concentration. c Total biomass produced by the three species averaged across the biofilm. d–f Species abundances relative to anaerobic values averaged across the biofilm
Fig. 5Combined effects of different diets and oxygen concentrations on the steady-state levels of SCFAs and succinate. Bulk carbohydrate and amino acid concentrations were varied according to the diet and the bulk oxygen concentration was set to a fixed value between 0 and 5x10 −3 mM. a Total SCFA concentration averaged across the biofilm. b–d Acetate, propionate and butyrate levels averaged across the biofilm. e Succinate concentration averaged across the biofilm. f Spatial profile of the F. prausnitzii butyrate synthesis rate at a bulk oxygen concentration of 3x10 −3 mM
Fig. 6Effect of oxygen perturbations with host-microbiota feedback. The oxygen perturbation was set to one value in the legend at time zero and sustained throughout the simulation. a Linear relationship mimicking the putative host-microbiota feedback mechanism. b Biofilm oxygen concentration averaged across the biofilm. c–e Species abundances averaged across the biofilm. f Butyrate concentration averaged across the biofilm