Literature DB >> 10099336

A review of experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms.

P S Stewart1.   

Abstract

Experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms are reviewed. Effective diffusive permeabilities, the parameter appropriate to the analysis of reaction-diffusion interactions, depend on solute type and biofilm density. Three categories of solute physical chemistry with distinct diffusive properties were distinguished by the present analysis. In order of descending mean relative effective diffusive permeability (De/Daq) these were inorganic anions or cations (0.56), nonpolar solutes with molecular weights of 44 or less (0.43), and organic solutes of molecular weight greater than 44 (0.29). Effective diffusive permeabilities decrease sharply with increasing biomass volume fraction suggesting a serial resistance model of diffusion in biofilms as proposed by Hinson and Kocher (1996). A conceptual model of biofilm structure is proposed in which each cell is surrounded by a restricted permeability envelope. Effective diffusion coefficients, which are appropriate to the analysis of transient penetration of nonreactive solutes, are generally similar to effective diffusive permeabilities in biofilms of similar composition. In three studies that examine diffusion of very large molecular weight solutes (>5000) in biofilms, the average ratio of the relative effective diffusion coefficient of the large solute to the relative effective diffusion coefficient of either sucrose or fluorescein was 0.64, 0.61, and 0.36. It is proposed that large solutes are effectively excluded from microbial cells, that small solutes partition into and diffuse within cells, and that ionic solutes are excluded from cells but exhibit increased diffusive permeability (but decreased effective diffusion coefficients) due to sorption to the biofilm matrix. Copyright 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10099336     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19980805)59:3<261::aid-bit1>3.0.co;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  71 in total

1.  Effect of catalase on hydrogen peroxide penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; F Roe; J Rayner; J G Elkins; Z Lewandowski; U A Ochsner; D J Hassett
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Diffusion in biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Spatial and temporal patterns of biocide action against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.

Authors:  William M Davison; Betsey Pitts; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Application of paramagnetically tagged molecules for magnetic resonance imaging of biofilm mass transport processes.

Authors:  B Ramanan; W M Holmes; W T Sloan; V R Phoenix
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Antibiotic-tolerant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Persists on Arthroplasty Materials.

Authors:  Kenneth L Urish; Peter W DeMuth; Brian W Kwan; David W Craft; Dongzhu Ma; Hani Haider; Rocky S Tuan; Thomas K Wood; Charles M Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Pseudomonad reverse carbon catabolite repression, interspecies metabolite exchange, and consortial division of labor.

Authors:  Heejoon Park; S Lee McGill; Adrienne D Arnold; Ross P Carlson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Extracellular DNA in single- and multiple-species unsaturated biofilms.

Authors:  R E Steinberger; P A Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Filipe Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Biopolymer and water dynamics in microbial biofilm extracellular polymeric substance.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hornemann; Anna A Lysova; Sarah L Codd; Joseph D Seymour; Scott C Busse; Philip S Stewart; Jennifer R Brown
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Ureolytic Biomineralization Reduces Proteus mirabilis Biofilm Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Xiaobao Li; Nanxi Lu; Hannah R Brady; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.