| Literature DB >> 27604193 |
Florian Geburek1, Moritz Gaus2, Hans T M van Schie3, Karl Rohn4, Peter M Stadler2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regenerative and anti-inflammatory effects on tendinopathies have been attributed to blood-derived biologicals. To date the evidence for the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment of naturally occurring equine tendinopathies is limited. The purpose of this placebo-controlled clinical trial was to describe the effect of a single treatment of equine superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) disease with PRP on clinical and ultrasonographic parameters. Twenty horses with naturally occurring tendinopathies of forelimb SDFTs were randomly assigned to the PRP-treated group (n = 10) or control group (n = 10) after clinical and ultrasonographic examination. The SDFTs received an intralesional treatment with autologous PRP or were injected with saline, respectively (day 0). All horses participated in a standardized exercise programme and were re-examined clinically, with B-mode ultrasonography (5 times at regular intervals) and ultrasound tissue characterization (week 12 and 24 after treatment) until week 24. Long-term performance was estimated via telephone inquiry.Entities:
Keywords: B-mode; Horse; Lameness; PRP; Platelet-rich plasma; Tendon; UTC; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound tissue characterization
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27604193 PMCID: PMC5015224 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0826-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Signalement, clinical history, diagnostic data and treatment of 20 horses with SDFT lesions
| Horse number | Breed | Age (y) | Gender | Purpose used for | Reported duration of SDFT tendinopathy until initial exam (w) | Reported initiating event | Limb affected | Maximal injury zone (MIZ) | Lesion type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRP-group | |||||||||
| 1 | Hannoverian | 4 | G | Dressage | 2 | Unknown | LF | 2a, lat | Marginal |
| 2 | Hannoverian | 8 | M | Dressage | 1 | Training | LF | 3a, palm | Marginal |
| 3 | Haflinger | 21 | G | Trained horse | 2 | Pasture turnout | LF | 2b | Diffuse |
| 4 | Trakehner | 5 | S | Dressage | 4 | Pasture turnout | RF | 3b, med | Marginal |
| 5 | Oldenburger | 16 | G | Police horse | 2 | Ride | RF | 2b | Diffuse |
| 6 | Rhenish Warmblood | 13 | M | Dressage | 2 | Unknown | RF | 3a | Core |
| 7 | Hannoverian | 6 | M | Dressage | 2 | Running free | LF | 2b, palm | Marginal |
| 8 | New Forest Pony | 13 | G | Pleasure | 3 | Pasture turnout | LF | 2b | Diffuse |
| 9 | Hannoverian | 11 | G | Eventing | 8 | Training | RF | 3a | Core |
| 10 | Pinto | 20 | G | Pleasure | 7 | Unknown | LF | 2b, lat | Marginal |
| ∅ 11.7 | |||||||||
| Control group | |||||||||
| 1 | Oldenburger | 9 | M | Jumping | 4 | Jumping | LF | 3a, lat | Marginal |
| 2 | Hannoverian | 5 | G | Dressage | 6 | Unknown | LF | 3a, med | Marginal |
| 3 | Andalusian | 18 | M | Pleasure | 3 | Pasture turnout | LF | 2b | Diffuse |
| 4 | Hannoverian | 15 | M | Dressage, jumping | 2 | Training | LF | 2b, med | Marginal |
| 5 | German Riding Pony | 9 | M | Jumping | 1 | Jumping | LF | 3a, lat | Marginal |
| 6 | Hannoverian | 12 | G | Police horse | 2 | Running free | RF | 1b, lat | Marginal |
| 7 | Hannoverian | 20 | M | Pleasure | 2 | Unknown | RF | 2a | diffuse |
| 8 | Rhenish Warmblood | 7 | G | Eventing | 2 | Training | LF | 3a | Core |
| 9 | Hannoverian | 10 | G | Eventing | 6 | Jumping | LF | 2b, lat | Marginal |
| 10 | Hannoverian | 6 | G | Pleasure | 4 | Unknown | RF | 3a | Diffuse |
| ∅ 11.1 | |||||||||
SDFT superficial digital fexor tendon, w week(s), y years, S stallion, M mare, G gelding, LF left front, RF right front, PRP-group SDFT treated with intralesional injection of platelet-rich plasma, Control group SDFT treated with intralesional saline injection, lat lateral, med medial, palm palmar, ∅ mean
Gradually increasing exercise programme adapted from Bosch et al. [14] and modified
| Exercise/day | Period |
|---|---|
| Box rest | 4 weeks |
| 10 min walk | Weeks 5–8 |
| 20 min walk + 2 × 3 min trot | Weeks 9–12 |
| 30 min walk + 15 min trot | Weeks 13–15 |
| 30 min walk + 15 min trot + 3 × 1 min gallop | Weeks 16–18 |
| 35 min walk + 15 min trot + 3 × 5 min gallop | Weeks 19–24 |
min minutes
Fig. 1Clinical findings after PRP and saline treatment of SDFT lesions over time. a Degree of lameness. b Scores for sensitivity to palpation. c Scores for skin surface temperature in the palmar metacarpal region. Mean ± SE; global test for PRPG and CG p < 0.001; Different letters (PRP normal and control italic) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within groups; PRPG = PRP-group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with PRP; CG = control group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with saline; black arrow = day 0: diagnosis, intralesional injection of PRP/saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; w = weeks; SDFT = superficial digital flexor tendon
Fig. 2B-mode ultrasonographic measurements. a Total cross sectional area of PRP- and saline treated SDFTs over time (global test: PRPG p = 0.079, CG p = 0.999). b Total echo scores of PRP- and saline treated SDFT lesions over time (global test: PRPG and CG p < 0.001). c Fiber alignment scores of PRP- and saline treated SDFT lesions over time (global test: PRPG and CG p < 0.001). Mean ± SE; Values labelled with asterisk (*) differ significantly (p < 0.05) between groups. Different letters (PRP normal and control italic) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within groups; PRPG = PRP-group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with PRP; CG = control group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with saline; black arrow = day 0: diagnosis, intralesional injection of PRP/saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; FAS = fiber alignment score; SDFT = superficial digital flexor tendon; TCSA = total cross sectional area; TES = total echo score; w = weeks
Fig. 3Ultrasound tissue characterization: Proportion of echo-types I-IV. Proportion of echo types a I, b II, c III and d IV for PRP and saline treated SDFTs; PRP-group: solid lines; Control group: dotted lines; Mean ± SE; Values labelled with asterisk (*) differ significantly (p < 0.05) between groups. Global tests: echo type I: PRPG p = 0.099, CG p = 0.004; echo type II: PRPG p = 0.204, CG p = 0.057; echo type III: PRPG p < 0.001, CG p = 0.002; echo type IV: PRPG p < 0.001, CG p = 0.940; Different letters (PRP normal and control italic) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within groups; PRPG = PRP-group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with PRP; CG = control group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; SDFT = superficial digital flexor tendon; w = weeks
Fig. 4Ultrasound tissue characterization: Proportion of combined echo-types (a) I + II and (b) III + IV. PRP-group: solid lines; Control group: dotted lines; Mean ± SE; Global tests: combined echo type I + II: PRPG p = 0.0826, CG p = 0.318; combined echo type I + II: PRPG p < 0.001; CG p = 0.362; Different letters (PRP normal and control italic) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) within groups; PRPG = PRP-group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with PRP; CG = control group: n = 10 limbs, SDFTs treated intralesionally with saline; PRP = platelet-rich plasma; SDFT = superficial digital flexor tendon; w = weeks