Literature DB >> 1439450

Cutaneous melanoma: prognosis and treatment results worldwide.

C M Balch1.   

Abstract

This first metanalysis of melanoma from treatment centers worldwide consisted of 15,798 patients with localized melanoma (stages I and II) and 2,116 stage II melanoma patients with nodal metastases. Comparisons of dominant prognostic variables showed consistent results from center to center, despite the heterogeneity of the patient population. Six of eight centers that performed a multivariate analysis ranked ulceration among the first three most dominant prognostic factors. Men had a higher proportion of ulcerated lesions than did women. There was a positive correlation between ulceration and thickness. Patients with melanoma of the scalp had a worse prognosis than did those with lesions of the face and neck; those with melanomas on the hands had a significantly worse prognosis than did those with lesions on the arms or legs. In this study, women had a statistically significant survival advantage over men. Their melanomas arose in more favorable sites, were thinner, and less ulcerative and had a lower stage of disease at presentation. Stage III melanomas were more common in males, thicker, and more ulcerated and had a nodular growth pattern. Patients with clinically occult nodal metastases detected by pathological examination and those with a single metastatic node fared the best. Five of six centers identified the number of metastatic nodes to be the most significant prognostic factor. Distant metastases (stage IV were analysed at only two centers, which found that the number and site of metastases appeared to be the dominant prognostic features of stage IV melanoma. When all factors were analyzed in a Cox regression analysis, the dominant factors for stage IV melanoma patients were (1) the number of metastatic sites, and (2) the remission duration. There were no histologic criteria of the primary melanomas that predicted the patient's clinical course once distant metastases had developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1439450     DOI: 10.1002/ssu.2980080611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1098-2388


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 121 low-risk melanomas (tumour thickness <1.00 mm) on the basis of a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Höller; Jörg Wenzel; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients.

Authors:  Charles R Scoggins; Merrick I Ross; Douglas S Reintgen; R Dirk Noyes; James S Goydos; Peter D Beitsch; Marshall M Urist; Stephan Ariyan; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Anees B Chagpar; Robert C G Martin; Arnold J Stromberg; Lee Hagendoorn; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Tailored versus generic interventions for skin cancer risk reduction for family members of melanoma patients.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Paul B Jacobsen; Michael E Ming; Gary Winkel; Sophie Dessureault; Stuart R Lessin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Molecular classification and subtype-specific characterization of skin cutaneous melanoma by aggregating multiple genomic platform data.

Authors:  Xiaofan Lu; Qianyuan Zhang; Yue Wang; Liya Zhang; Huiling Zhao; Chen Chen; Yaoyan Wang; Shengjie Liu; Tao Lu; Fei Wang; Fangrong Yan
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  An observational study regarding the rate of growth in vertical and radial growth phase superficial spreading melanomas.

Authors:  Roberto Betti; Elena Agape; Raffaella Vergani; Laura Moneghini; Amilcare Cerri
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Sentinel lymph node status as most important prognostic factor in patients with high-risk cutaneous melanomas (tumour thickness >4.00 mm): outcome analysis from a single institution.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Hoeller; Joerg Wenzel; Hans-J Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Staging and prognosis of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Paxton V Dickson; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.495

8.  Imaging of gastrointestinal melanoma metastases: Correlation with surgery and histopathology of resected specimen.

Authors:  Ahmed E Othman; Thomas K Eigentler; Georg Bier; Christina Pfannenberg; Hans Bösmüller; Christian Thiel; Claus Garbe; Konstantin Nikolaou; Bernhard Klumpp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Improved survival for stage IV melanoma from an unknown primary site.

Authors:  Chris C Lee; Mark B Faries; Leslie A Wanek; Donald L Morton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Solitary dermal melanoma: beginning or end of the metastatic process?

Authors:  Chris C Lee; Mark B Faries; Xing Ye; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.