Literature DB >> 27601960

Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT.

Ana Cravo Sá1, Ana Peres1, Mónica Pereira1, Carina Marques Coelho1, Fátima Monsanto1, Ana Macedo2, Adrian Lamas3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV.
BACKGROUND: Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 223 CBCT images used for alignment with the CT planning scan based on bony anatomy were analyzed in 12 patients treated with IMRT following prostatectomy. Shifts of CBCT images were recorded in three directions to calculate the required margin to create PTV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The mean and standard deviation (SD) values in millimetres were -0.05 ± 1.35 in the LR direction, -0.03 ± 0.65 in the SI direction and -0.02 ± 2.05 the AP direction. The systematic error measured in the LR, SI and AP direction were 1.35 mm, 0.65 mm, and 2.05 mm with a random error of 2.07 mm; 1.45 mm and 3.16 mm, resulting in a PTV margin of 4.82 mm; 2.64 mm, and 7.33 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: With IGRT we suggest a margin of 5 mm, 3 mm and 8 mm in the LR, SI and AP direction, respectively, to PTV1 and PTV2. Therefore, this study supports an anisotropic margin expansion to the PTV being the largest expansion in the AP direction and lower in SI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography; Geometric uncertainty; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Planning target volume margin; Prostate tumour

Year:  2015        PMID: 27601960      PMCID: PMC5002028          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  25 in total

1.  Dose verification in clinical IMRT prostate incidents.

Authors:  Panagiotis Sandilos; Angelos Angelopoulos; Panagiotis Baras; Konstantinos Dardoufas; Pantelis Karaiskos; Panagiotis Kipouros; Marek Kozicki; Janusz M Rosiak; Loukas Sakelliou; Ioannis Seimenis; Lampros Vlahos
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Gold seed fiducials in analysis of linear and rotational displacement of the prostate bed.

Authors:  Elisa Ålander; Harri Visapää; Mauri Kouri; Jani Keyriläinen; Kauko Saarilahti; Mikko Tenhunen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Assessment of planning target volume margins for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate gland: role of daily inter- and intrafraction motion.

Authors:  James A Tanyi; Tongming He; Paige A Summers; Ruth G Mburu; Catherine M Kato; Stephen M Rhodes; Arthur Y Hung; Martin Fuss
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Inter- and intrafraction uncertainty in prostate bed image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kitty Huang; David A Palma; Danielle Scott; Danielle McGregor; Stewart Gaede; Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman; Alexander V Louie; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  The impact of rectal and bladder variability on target coverage during post-prostatectomy intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Linda J Bell; Jennifer Cox; Thomas Eade; Marianne Rinks; Andrew Kneebone
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  A comparison of the acute toxicity profile between two-dimensional and three-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy for postoperative prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Ost; W De Gersem; B De Potter; V Fonteyne; W De Neve; G De Meerleer
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eugene Huang; Lei Dong; Anurag Chandra; Deborah A Kuban; Isaac I Rosen; Anissa Evans; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating systematic patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.

Authors:  Joseph A Moore; J James Gordon; Mitchell Anscher; Joaquin Silva; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Michael A Hussey; Catherine M Tangen; Joseph Chin; Edward Messing; Edith Canby-Hagino; Jeffrey D Forman; Ian M Thompson; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  PTV margin definition in hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers.

Authors:  Christoph Oehler; Stephanie Lang; Peter Dimmerling; Christian Bolesch; Stephan Kloeck; Alessandra Tini; Christoph Glanzmann; Yousef Najafi; Gabriela Studer; Daniel R Zwahlen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.