Literature DB >> 27601824

"Slide less pathology": Fairy tale or reality?

M Indu1, R Rathy1, M P Binu2.   

Abstract

Pathology practice is significantly advanced in various frontiers. Therefore, "slide less digital" pathology will not be a mere imagination in near future. Digitalization of histopathological slides (whole slide imaging [WSI]) is possible with the help of whole slide scanner. The WSI has a positive impact not only in routine practice but also in research field, medical education and bioindustry. Even if digital pathology has definitive advantages, its widespread use is not yet possible. As it is an upcoming technology in our field, this article is aimed to discussessential aspects of WSI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital pathology; medical education; telepathology; whole slide imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601824      PMCID: PMC4989562          DOI: 10.4103/0973-029X.185921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol        ISSN: 0973-029X


INTRODUCTION

The current imaging modalities in pathology practice are static photomicrography of the slide, slide scanning by robotic microscope and whole slide imaging (WSI). Wetzel and Gilbertson developed automated WSI system in 1999 and since then methodology of imaging has been changing slowly but steadily.[1] Whole slide image (virtual image, digital slides) denote a digitalized image of entire histopathology slide or a selected area of it.[2] These digital images have high-resolution and offer access to all areas on a slide. These images can be viewed on personal computers, laptops or iPhones in any magnification.[3]

DIGITALIZATION OF IMAGES

The digital imaging has four important steps: Image acquisition, storage, editing and display of images.[4] Digitalization is performed with the help of WSI scanners, which has a hardware and software component. Hardware component is for handling and scanning the slides, storing the images, transmission and display of the images to pathologists. Software part facilitates formatting, compressing and viewing the images. Other important requirements associated with WSI system is high-speed internet connection and security measures to protect patient information.[5] Slide scanning can be done in tile or linear pattern. In tile pattern, the slide is scanned as a series of rectangular tiles [Figure 1a and b]. In linear pattern, image acquisition is done as long narrow strips [Figure 1c]. Focusing strategies can also vary among scanners. In “focus every field” method [Figure 1a], each field/tile is auto-focused and is imaged. It is an accurate but time-consuming method. In “focus every nth field” method [Figure 1b], focusing occurs every nth field. It is a faster and simpler method. “Focus map” method [Figure 1c] can be used with either tile or line pattern of scanning. Here, focus points are distributed over the tissue forming a surface. It is faster but less accurate method.[67]
Figure 1

(a and b) Tile pattern of scanning. The arrows show direction of scanning. Blue dots in 1a indicate “focus every field” method. Dots in 1b indicate “focus every nth field” method. (Courtesy: Dr. Toby C. Cornish, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pathology, John Hopkins Medicine). (c) Linear pattern of scanning. Blue dots in 1c indicate “focus map” method ( = focus point, = direction of scanning)

(a and b) Tile pattern of scanning. The arrows show direction of scanning. Blue dots in 1a indicate “focus every field” method. Dots in 1b indicate “focus every nth field” method. (Courtesy: Dr. Toby C. Cornish, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pathology, John Hopkins Medicine). (c) Linear pattern of scanning. Blue dots in 1c indicate “focus map” method ( = focus point, = direction of scanning) WSI can be broadly divided into bright field, fluorescence and multispectral. Bright field WSI is the most common and least expensive type of method. Fluorescent WSI works on the same principle as a standard fluorescence microscope and only tile scanners are appropriate for fluorescence scanning. It is mainly used with immunofluorescence and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).[8] Multispectral imaging is a specialized form of digital microscopy for capturing spectral information across the visible range of light to near infrared bands. Multispectral systems are capable of working with fluorescence or bright field-based analysis.[1] Spectral imaging helps fluorescent imaging to overcome problems created by autofluorescence in tissue specimens.[19] The main disadvantage is its slow working pattern and complexity of the sample preparation.[9] Scanning of slides occurs at multiple planes (x, y and z-axis) and magnifications.[5] Finally, small images are digitally “knits” into a single large image. Many scanners have auto loading facility where up to 200 slides can be loaded in the racks instead of one slide at a time.[3]

WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING FILE SIZE AND FORMAT

The file size of digital images is large, which comes in gigabits. As it is difficult to store such large files, they are usually compressed using Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) or JPEG 2000 algorithms.[1011]

APPLICATIONS OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING

Different sectors of pathology are aided by WSI. Applications of WSI are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Applications of whole slide imaging

Applications of whole slide imaging

WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING IN ROUTINE PRACTICE AND TELEPATHOLOGY

Digital slides are currently entering into day-to-day pathology practice. Adoption of WSI for routine diagnostic procedures has been done only in few centers.[4516] Digital slides offer several advantages over glass slides such as portability and ease of sharing.[45] According to Jen et al., digital slides are reliable for the evaluation of renal allograft biopsies.[13] Krishnamurthy et al. compared digital slides with optical microscopy for interpretation of breast carcinoma tissues. They concluded that both methods have similar accuracy, precision and reproducibility in interpretation.[12] Good correlation between standard glass slide and digital slides are noted with gastrointestinal,[17] pulmonary[18] and prostate[19] specimens. Telepathology system includes a digital imaging station, telecommunications network to transmit images and monitor or screen to remotely view the digital images. WSI telepathology has several advantages over telepathology using precaptured still images. Accessibility to an entire digital slide, the ability to choose automated or manual scanning, high-resolution of images and the option to use software for image analysis are main advantages of WSI telepathology.[4] Digitalization combined with telepathology is helpful when there is a shortage of pathologists, when the hospital is in remote location with large number of difficult cases/frozen sections, which require rapid interpretations.[520] The University Health Network Canada found this technology safe, accurate and reliable.[5] According to Piccolo et al., telepathology for dermatologic diagnosis appears to be reliable.[21]

WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH

Many medical schools accepted digital slides for undergraduate and resident training.[2223] According to Pantanowitz, this is the best possible application for pathology education.[4] At the Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland, WebMicroscope (online interactive teaching and examination platform) facilitate accessibility to pathology for dental students.[24] Digital slides are easy to handle in many ways.[3] In newly established medical and dental colleges, there will be shortage of histopathological slides and microscopes. Digital slides can encourage self-study as it can view on laptop or iPhones.[25] Online slide-sharing services such as PathXchange, Slide2Go provide accessibility to online virtual teaching sets.[1026] Case presentations can be made more effective and interactive with help of digital images. It takes less preparation time than photographing the histopathological details. Salient pathological features can be marked on digital slides for teaching purpose and presentations.[3] Most common problems encountered with fluorescent labels, especially in sensitive research areas such as genomic FISH, are small signal size and fading of fluorescent signals which can leads to false negative results. WSI reveals these small signals by scanning several focal planes through the sample (z-stacking) and these digital slides act as permanent records. Therefore, WSI is an accurate method to assess quantification and location of gene/chromosome.[8] Tissue microarray (TMA) has been extensively used for biomarker screening and validation studies in cancer research and toxicology testing. TMA image acquisition is a tedious procedure with optical microscopy. Digital TMA is more ergonomic and accurate.[827] Digital pathology can also assist virtual tumor banks such as the European human frozen tumor tissue bank.[28]

WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS

WSI image analysis assesses cytomorphometry, antibodies detection and quantification of biomarkers.[5] Slodkowskaet al. tried to detect accuracy of Ki-67 assessment in brain tumors with computer-assisted image analysis using WSI. They proved that computer-assisted image analysis using WSI can be an effective alternative.[29] Virtual immunohistochemistry is done routinely for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor analysis.[4530] Biomarker quantification in TMA can be more accurately done with the automated image analysis options.[8] Multispectral image analysis is valuable tool in cytopathology to differentiate the similar lesions.[31]

VALIDATION OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING SYSTEM

The Food and Drug Administration included WSI in Class III (highest risk) medical devices. Class III devices require quality system regulation and premarket approval.[32] Therefore, validation of WSI is vital to ensure its diagnostic performance. Currently, there are no standard guidelines for validation of WSI.[2] The College of American Pathologists's (CAP) Pathology and Laboratory quality center proposed certain guidelines for validation of WSI.[2] CAP guidelines are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

The College of American Pathologists guidelines regarding validation of whole slide imaging

The College of American Pathologists guidelines regarding validation of whole slide imaging

ADVANTAGES OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING

Digital slides have several advantages over conventional method. Digitalization provides high-resolution digital images within relatively short time span. Redondo et al. compared digital slides with photomicrographs taken with help of optical microscope. Better image quality in term of color and contrast was noted with digital slides. Sharma et al. reported that some attributes of digital images might be better than conventional methods such as portability, archiving, sharing and performing image analysis.[22] Ramey et al. reported positive results in terms of concordance when virtual slides of frozen sections were reviewed on a mobile device (iPad).[3334] Easy retrieval of archival images is another advantage. There will not be any issue related to slide breakage and fading of stains. Ability to make use of computer-aided image analysis becomes possible by the advent of digital images. Quality assurance and testing can be done easily with the use of digital slides. It can also act as a permanent record of sent-out slides, slides sent for medico legal cases and digital image analysis.[45]

DISADVANTAGES OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING

However, the cost for infrastructure, additional human resources and validation of the process cannot be affordable for institutions/laboratories in developing countries. The pathologist, histotechnologists and information technology staffs who form the backbone of telepathology team should be available at the center. Continuous supply of power during overnight scanning, uninterrupted internet services and high-resolution monitors are other difficult areas.[5] Technical problems such as scanning difficulties, hardware and software problems are main limitations for WSI telepathology.[4] Large size of the digital file would be an issue while digital archiving of slides. Z-scanning of glass slides increases scanning time and file size. Few currently available scanners can afford slides from large tissue blocks.[35] It was also observed by some investigators that the time required to review a virtual slide took longer than that needed to examine a glass slide. Other issues limiting the use of digital pathology include the perception among pathologists that WSI systems are inferior in terms of performance and legal issues related to teleconsultation across states and internationally.[15] Quality of virtual slides depends on the quality of the original slide to a certain extent. The glass slides to be scanned have to be free of artifacts such as folds, knife marks, air bubbles and stain deposits. Current scanning technology does not satisfactorily accommodate thick smears and three-dimensional cell groups in cytopathology.[3] Inadequate clinical data (gross pathology description, prior pathology reports, clinical history), missed tissue on the digital slide, pathologists' lack of experience using a WSI system can lead to erroneous diagnosis.[36] Table 3 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of WSI.
Table 3

Advantages and disadvantages of whole slide imaging

Advantages and disadvantages of whole slide imaging

HOW TO OVERCOME LIMITATIONS OF WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING?

The main limitations of WSI system are its high cost and lack of proper training for the use of the new technology. Discrepancies in diagnoses between digital and glass slides were reported in few publications.[12] Discrepancies in diagnoses between digital and glass slides were attributed to poor image quality, rarely missed tissue on the digital image, inadequate clinical data and pathologists' lack of experience using the WSI system. Increased time taken for digital slide analysis is perhaps because of the inherent learning curve associated with the new technology.[12] Proper training of pathologists and technicians could overcome these problems. It is still difficult to scan thick smears using WSI. This can be overcome by multiplane scanning along multiple z-axes or intercalation of scanned images along different focal points.[4] WSI was perceived to be more time-consuming than optical microscopy.[12] Independent dual sensor scanning is helpful to reduce the time for image acquisition.[7] According to the study conducted by Yagi and Gilbertson, thinner tissue sectioning (by automated tissue sectioning) significantly reduces slide scanning times and improve image quality.[37] The main limitation, i.e., cost of scanners, is expected to be decreased by invention of new technologies for economic manufacturing. This may lead to adoption of WSI even in developing countries.

CONCLUSION

Until now, microscopes remain to be the cornerstone of pathology practice. However, in near future, slide scanners can share that position. More accurate and speedy diagnosis of lesions is the ultimate goal of pathology practice regardless of the methods/instruments used. A state of mind that accepts and adapts to the better changes is the most important tool to overcome any limitation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  31 in total

1.  Digital slide and virtual microscopy based routine and telepathology evaluation of routine gastrointestinal biopsy specimens.

Authors:  B Molnar; L Berczi; C Diczhazy; A Tagscherer; S V Varga; B Szende; Z Tulassay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.

Authors:  Philippe Camparo; Lars Egevad; Ferran Algaba; Daniel M Berney; Liliane Boccon-Gibod; Eva Compérat; Andrew J Evans; Rainer Grobholz; Glen Kristiansen; Cord Langner; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Rodolfo Montironi; Pedro Oliveira; Ben Vainer; Murali Varma
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  TuBaFrost 6: virtual microscopy in virtual tumour banking.

Authors:  I Teodorovic; M Isabelle; A Carbone; A Passioukov; S Lejeune; D Jaminé; P Therasse; A Gloghini; W N M Dinjens; K H Lam; M H A Oomen; A Spatz; C Ratcliffe; K Knox; R Mager; D Kerr; F Pezzella; B van Damme; M van de Vijver; H van Boven; M M Morente; S Alonso; D Kerjaschki; J Pammer; J A Lopez-Guerrero; A Llombart Bosch; E-B van Veen; J W Oosterhuis; P H J Riegman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Virtual slides: application in pulmonary pathology consultations.

Authors:  Janina Słodkowska; Lech Chyczewski; Michał Wojciechowski
Journal:  Folia Histochem Cytobiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.698

5.  Beyond morphology: whole slide imaging, computer-aided detection, and other techniques.

Authors:  Michael D Feldman
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Multispectral imaging and pathology: seeing and doing more.

Authors:  Richard M Levenson; Alessandro Fornari; Massimo Loda
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-09

7.  Credentialing preclinical pediatric xenograft models using gene expression and tissue microarray analysis.

Authors:  Craig C Whiteford; Sven Bilke; Braden T Greer; Qingrong Chen; Till A Braunschweig; Nicola Cenacchi; Jun S Wei; Malcolm A Smith; Peter Houghton; Christopher Morton; C Patrick Reynolds; Richard Lock; Richard Gorlick; Chand Khanna; Carol J Thiele; Mikiko Takikita; Daniel Catchpoole; Stephen M Hewitt; Javed Khan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Autofocus methods of whole slide imaging systems and the introduction of a second-generation independent dual sensor scanning method.

Authors:  Michael C Montalto; Richard R McKay; Robert J Filkins
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-10-19

9.  A relationship between slide quality and image quality in whole slide imaging (WSI).

Authors:  Yukako Yagi; John R Gilbertson
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Personalized Oncology Suite: integrating next-generation sequencing data and whole-slide bioimages.

Authors:  Andreas Dander; Matthias Baldauf; Michael Sperk; Stephan Pabinger; Benjamin Hiltpolt; Zlatko Trajanoski
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Digital Microscopy, Image Analysis, and Virtual Slide Repository.

Authors:  Famke Aeffner; Hibret A Adissu; Michael C Boyle; Robert D Cardiff; Erik Hagendorn; Mark J Hoenerhoff; Robert Klopfleisch; Susan Newbigging; Dirk Schaudien; Oliver Turner; Kristin Wilson
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Comparison between digital and optical microscopy: Analysis in a mouse gut inflammation model.

Authors:  Airton Pereira E Silva; Sylvia Maria Nicolau Campos; Isabelle Mazza Guimarães; Gerlinde Agate Platais Brasil Teixeira
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 3.  Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) in Pathology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.

Authors:  Neeta Kumar; Ruchika Gupta; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Alternative Strategy Adopted in Practical Assessment for Pathology Postgraduate Certification Examination Amidst COVID-19 Nationwide Lockdown: An Indian Experience with a Novel Hybrid Method of Assessment.

Authors:  Shalinee Rao; Nilotpal Chowdhury; Manisha Naithani; Ashok Singh; Neha Singh; Arvind Kumar Gupta; Rajesh Kathrotia
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 5.  Contemporary Whole Slide Imaging Devices and Their Applications within the Modern Pathology Department: A Selected Hardware Review.

Authors:  Ankush Patel; Ulysses G J Balis; Jerome Cheng; Zaibo Li; Giovanni Lujan; David S McClintock; Liron Pantanowitz; Anil Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-12-09

6.  Development of a reliable and accurate algorithm to quantify the tumor immune stroma (QTiS) across tumor types.

Authors:  Rainer Christoph Miksch; Jingcheng Hao; Markus Bo Schoenberg; Katharina Dötzer; Friederike Schlüter; Maximilian Weniger; Shuai Yin; Steffen Ormanns; Jan Goesta D'Haese; Markus Otto Guba; Jens Werner; Barbara Mayer; Alexandr V Bazhin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.