Literature DB >> 18234276

Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies.

Jeffrey L Fine1, Dana M Grzybicki, Russell Silowash, Jonhan Ho, John R Gilbertson, Leslie Anthony, Robb Wilson, Anil V Parwani, Sheldon I Bastacky, Jonathan I Epstein, Drazen M Jukic.   

Abstract

Whole slide images (WSIs), also known as virtual slides, can support electronic distribution of immunohistochemistry (IHC) stains to pathologists that rely on remote sites for these services. This may lead to improvement in turnaround times, reduction of courier costs, fewer errors in slide distribution, and automated image analyses. Although this approach is practiced de facto today in some large laboratories, there are no clinical validation studies on this approach. Our retrospective study evaluated the interpretation of IHC stains performed in difficult prostate biopsies using WSIs. The study included 30 foci with IHC stains identified by the original pathologist as both difficult and pivotal to the final diagnosis. WSIs were created from the glass slides using a scanning robot (T2, Aperio Technologies, Vista, CA). An evaluation form was designed to capture data in 2 phases: (1) interpretation of WSIs and (2) interpretation of glass slides. Data included stain interpretations, diagnoses, and other parameters such as time required to diagnose and image/slide quality. Data were also collected from an expert prostate pathologist, consensus meetings, and a poststudy focus group. WSI diagnostic validity (intraobserver pairwise kappa statistics) was "almost perfect" for 1 pathologist, "substantial" for 3 pathologists, and "moderate" for 1 pathologist. Diagnostic agreement between the final/consensus diagnoses of the group and those of the domain expert was "almost perfect" (kappa = 0.817). Except for one instance, WSI technology was not felt to be the cause of disagreements. These results are encouraging and compare favorably with other efforts to quantify diagnostic variability in surgical pathology. With thorough training, careful validation of specific applications, and regular postsignout review of glass IHC slides (eg, quality assurance review), WSI technology can be used for IHC stain interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234276     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  20 in total

1.  Validation of digital microscopy in the histopathological diagnoses of oral diseases.

Authors:  Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo; Gleyson Kleber Amaral-Silva; Felipe Paiva Fonseca; Natália Rangel Palmier; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Paul M Speight; Oslei Paes de Almeida; Pablo Agustin Vargas; Alan Roger Santos-Silva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Performance of residents using digital images versus glass slides on certification examination in anatomical pathology: a mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Lorna Mirham; Christopher Naugler; Malcolm Hayes; Nadia Ismiil; Annie Belisle; Shachar Sade; Catherine Streutker; Christina MacMillan; Golnar Rasty; Snezana Popovic; Mariamma Joseph; Manal Gabril; Penny Barnes; Richard G Hegele; Beverley Carter; George M Yousef
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25

3.  A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry.

Authors:  Julia C Gage; Nancy Joste; Brigette M Ronnett; Mark Stoler; William C Hunt; Mark Schiffman; Cosette M Wheeler
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Direct scanning of pathology specimens using spectral domain optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Fine; Larry Kagemann; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

5.  Quantitative image analysis in the assessment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Devon S Chabot-Richards; David R Martin; Orrin B Myers; David R Czuchlewski; Kristin E Hunt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations.

Authors:  David C Wilbur; Kalil Madi; Robert B Colvin; Lyn M Duncan; William C Faquin; Judith A Ferry; Matthew P Frosch; Stuart L Houser; Richard L Kradin; Gregory Y Lauwers; David N Louis; Eugene J Mark; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Joseph Misdraji; Gunnlauger P Nielsen; Martha B Pitman; Andrew E Rosenberg; R Neal Smith; Aliyah R Sohani; James R Stone; Rosemary H Tambouret; Chin-Lee Wu; Robert H Young; Artur Zembowicz; Wolfgang Klietmann
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study.

Authors:  Guoping Cai; Lisa A Teot; Walid E Khalbuss; Jing Yu; Sara E Monaco; Drazen M Jukic; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-05-26

8.  Image analysis algorithms for immunohistochemical assessment of cell death events and fibrosis in tissue sections.

Authors:  Maryla Krajewska; Layton H Smith; Juan Rong; Xianshu Huang; Marc L Hyer; Nikolajs Zeps; Barry Iacopetta; Steven P Linke; Allen H Olson; John C Reed; Stan Krajewski
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.

Authors:  Liron Pantanowitz; John H Sinard; Walter H Henricks; Lisa A Fatheree; Alexis B Carter; Lydia Contis; Bruce A Beckwith; Andrew J Evans; Avtar Lal; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Digital pathology: Attitudes and practices in the Canadian pathology community.

Authors:  Magdaleni Bellis; Shereen Metias; Christopher Naugler; Aaron Pollett; Serge Jothy; George M Yousef
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.