Literature DB >> 15701493

Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy.

Jai Bikhchandani1, P N Agarwal, Ravi Kant, V K Malik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new technique of circular stapler for the treatment of hemorrhoids has shown early promise in terms of minimal or no postoperative pain, early discharge from hospital, and quick return to work. This study was designed to compare stapled technique with the well-accepted conventional Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
METHODS: After fulfilling the selection criteria, 84 patients were randomly allocated to the stapled (n = 42) or open group (n = 42). All patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. The 2 techniques were evaluated with respect to the operative time, pain scores, complications, day of discharge, return to work, and level of satisfaction.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 46.02 years (SD, 12.33) in the stapled group and 48.64 years (14.57) in the open group. Grade III or IV hemorrhoids were more common in men (ie, 80.9% and 85.7% in the stapled and open group, respectively). The mean operative time was shorter in the stapled group 24.28 minutes (4.25) versus 45.21 minutes (5.36) in the Milligan-Morgan group (P < .001). The blood loss, pain scores and requirement of analgesics was significantly less in the stapled group. Mean hospital stay was 1.24 days (0.62) and 2.76 days (1.01) (P < .001) in the stapled and open group, respectively. The patients in the stapled group returned to work or routine activities earlier (ie, within 8.12 days [2.48]) as compared with 17.62 (5.59) in the open group. Only 88.1% of patients were satisfied by the open method compared with 97.6% after the stapled technique. The median follow-up period was 11 months with a maximum follow-up of 19 months (range 2-19 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and effective day-care procedure for the treatment of grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. It ensures lesser postoperative pain, early discharge, less time off work, complications similar to the open technique, and in the end a more satisfied patient with no perianal wound. However, more such randomized trials are essential to deny any long-term complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701493     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Liam A Haveran; Paul R Sturrock; Mark Y Sun; Janet McDade; Sudershan Singla; Craig A Paterson; Timothy C Counihan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Haemorrhoidal suffering].

Authors:  G Pühse; F Raulf
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy; results of a prospective clinical trial in saudi arabia.

Authors:  Salman Yousuf Guraya; Gamal A Khairy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 6.  Documented complications of staple hemorrhoidopexy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Liesel J Porrett; Jemma K Porrett; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01

7.  Doppler-Guided Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (DG-THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the Treatment of Third-Degree Hemorrhoids: Clinical Results at Short and Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  S Leardi; B Pessia; M Mascio; F Piccione; M Schietroma; R Pietroletti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Stapled and conventional Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: different solutions for different targets.

Authors:  Alessandra Panarese; Daniele Pironi; Maurizio Vendettuoli; Stefano Pontone; Stefano Arcieri; Andrea Conversi; Anna Maria Romani; Angelo Filippini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Anne Eberstein; Karin Pfister
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  J Castellví; A Sueiras; J Espinosa; J Vallet; V Gil; F Pi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.